Comparison Overview

P.F. Chang's

VS

Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.

P.F. Chang's

8377 E Hartford Dr, #200, Scottsdale, Arizona, US, 85255
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

P.F. Chang’s is a restaurant concept that honors the 2,000-year-old Asian tradition of wok cooking and believes in making food from scratch every day in every restaurant. Since inception, P.F. Chang’s chefs hand-roll dim sum, hand chop and slice all vegetables and meats, handcraft every sauce and wok-cook each recipe, every day in every restaurant using wholesome, fresh ingredients. Start a career that won’t flame out. With excellent benefits and perks, a job at P.F. Chang’s means working alongside some of the best people in the business. Apply today to join the P.F. Chang’s team.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 10,302
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.

2202 N West Shore Blvd, None, Tampa, Florida, US, 33607
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Since the first Outback Steakhouse opened, our family of brands has expanded to include Carrabba's Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, and Fleming's Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar. Together, these unique, Founder-inspired restaurants make up Bloomin' Brands, Inc. Today, we are one of the world's largest casual dining companies with approximately 81,000 Team Members and more than 1,450 restaurants worldwide. Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. is a company of restaurants, not a restaurant company. Our brands were founded by people who have a genuine passion for food and a desire to share hospitality with others. Our focus on quality extends beyond the food and service we provide to our guests – Our People are what set us apart and they are at the center of everything we do!

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 1,431
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pfchangs.jpeg
P.F. Chang's
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloomin'​-brands-inc.jpeg
Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
P.F. Chang's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for P.F. Chang's in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — P.F. Chang's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

P.F. Chang's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pfchangs.jpeg
P.F. Chang's
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloomin'​-brands-inc.jpeg
Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

P.F. Chang's company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

P.F. Chang's company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company and P.F. Chang's company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company nor P.F. Chang's company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

P.F. Chang's company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company nor P.F. Chang's company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither P.F. Chang's company nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither P.F. Chang's company nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

P.F. Chang's company employs more people globally than Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither P.F. Chang's nor Bloomin'​ Brands, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H