Comparison Overview

Pew Research Center

VS

Bruegel - Improving economic policy

Pew Research Center

1615 L St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bruegel - Improving economic policy

Rue de la Charité 33, Brussels, BE, 1210
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Bruegel is the European think tank specialising in economics. Our mission is to contribute to the quality of economic policy making in Europe through open, fact-based and policy-relevant research, analysis and discussion. Established in 2005, Bruegel is independent and non-doctrinal. We are committed to impartiality, openness and excellence. Bruegel’s membership includes EU Member State governments, international corporations and institutions. Sign up for our weekly updates at http://www.bruegel.org/newsletter/.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 70
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-research-center.jpeg
Pew Research Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bruegel.jpeg
Bruegel - Improving economic policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pew Research Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bruegel - Improving economic policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pew Research Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bruegel - Improving economic policy in 2025.

Incident History — Pew Research Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pew Research Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bruegel - Improving economic policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bruegel - Improving economic policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-research-center.jpeg
Pew Research Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bruegel.jpeg
Bruegel - Improving economic policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pew Research Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bruegel - Improving economic policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bruegel - Improving economic policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pew Research Center company.

In the current year, Bruegel - Improving economic policy company and Pew Research Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bruegel - Improving economic policy company nor Pew Research Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bruegel - Improving economic policy company nor Pew Research Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bruegel - Improving economic policy company nor Pew Research Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pew Research Center company employs more people globally than Bruegel - Improving economic policy company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pew Research Center nor Bruegel - Improving economic policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X