Comparison Overview

Pew Law Center

VS

Cozens-Hardy LLP

Pew Law Center

1811 S. Alma School Road, Mesa, Arizona, 85210, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Pew Law Center is here to help guide you through all of your bankruptcy and tax resolution needs. We help client's with tax and bankruptcy in Phoenix, Mesa, Tempe, Scottsdale, and all over the State Are you Struggling? Do you need Bankruptcy or Tax Help? At the Pew Law Center we can help! Call (480) 745-1770 today!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cozens-Hardy LLP

Castle Chambers, Norwich, NR1 3DP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

You may need to use a law firm for anything from buying a house or business premises to making a Will or getting divorced. We are a small, friendly firm of solicitors based in Norwich who are here to help you when you need us. We pride ourselves on being approachable and understanding because we know how difficult it can be to take the step of instructing a solicitor to sort out your issue. Our leading practice has a long-standing history, operating from our convenient city centre premises for over a century. Over all those years, we have built our reputation for honesty, integrity and excellent standards of service. No matter what your requirement for legal assistance, our goal is to understand your personal situation, provide you with a cost effective, clear solution and deliver with our usual exceptional customer service.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-law-center.jpeg
Pew Law Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cozens-hardy-llp.jpeg
Cozens-Hardy LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pew Law Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cozens-Hardy LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pew Law Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cozens-Hardy LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Pew Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pew Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cozens-Hardy LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cozens-Hardy LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-law-center.jpeg
Pew Law Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cozens-hardy-llp.jpeg
Cozens-Hardy LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pew Law Center company and Cozens-Hardy LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cozens-Hardy LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pew Law Center company.

In the current year, Cozens-Hardy LLP company and Pew Law Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cozens-Hardy LLP company nor Pew Law Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cozens-Hardy LLP company nor Pew Law Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cozens-Hardy LLP company nor Pew Law Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pew Law Center company nor Cozens-Hardy LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pew Law Center company nor Cozens-Hardy LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cozens-Hardy LLP company employs more people globally than Pew Law Center company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pew Law Center nor Cozens-Hardy LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X