Comparison Overview

Peterson Law LLP

VS

Legal Voice

Peterson Law LLP

545 Metro Place South, Suite 435, None, Dublin, Ohio, US, 43017
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

At Peterson Law LLP, we use innovative legal strategies to help clients find practical solutions to their legal issues. With experience in several practice areas, we have one goal: to help you achieve your objectives. We take a principled approach to practicing law. At every step that we work with you, we will do so with integrity. Our Ohio team strongly believes in offering sophisticated, effective representation in a manner that provides value to you. We frequently achieve the results that we seek via alternative dispute resolution. As skilled litigators, we will also advocate for you in court. Whether resolving a business dispute, purchasing or selling real estate or defending you from criminal charges, Peterson Law LLP is here to stand with you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Voice

907 Pine St, Seattle, 98101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Legal Voice fights for gender liberation across the Northwest. From courtrooms to the court of public opinion, we challenge patriarchal and racist power structures to widen pathways to justice through groundbreaking litigation, legislative advocacy, and legal rights education. As a progressive feminist organization with an intersectional approach to gender justice, Legal Voice centers the most-impacted community voices across all levels of our advocacy, rooting our work in our race equity values.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peterson-llp.jpeg
Peterson Law LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peterson Law LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Voice
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peterson Law LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Voice in 2025.

Incident History — Peterson Law LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peterson Law LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Voice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Voice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peterson-llp.jpeg
Peterson Law LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-voice.jpeg
Legal Voice
Incidents

FAQ

Peterson Law LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Legal Voice company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legal Voice company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peterson Law LLP company.

In the current year, Legal Voice company and Peterson Law LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Voice company nor Peterson Law LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Voice company nor Peterson Law LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Voice company nor Peterson Law LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peterson Law LLP company nor Legal Voice company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peterson Law LLP company nor Legal Voice company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legal Voice company employs more people globally than Peterson Law LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peterson Law LLP nor Legal Voice holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X