Comparison Overview

Peter Lynn & Partners

VS

Ross & Smith, PC

Peter Lynn & Partners

2nd Floor, Langdon House Langdon Road, Swansea, Swansea, SA1 8QY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Swansea based solicitors, Peter Lynn & Partners, offer a wide range of legal advice and services to individuals and businesses across South Wales. Our experienced staff can help you in all matters from starting a business and drawing up contracts to HR advice. We can also help you through a divorce, make a will or claim compensation from an accident.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ross & Smith, PC

700 N Pearl St, Suite 1610, Dallas, Texas, US, 75201
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Ross & Smith, PC possesses the legal skillsets, expertise, and diverse experience necessary to handle every type of dispute relating to business insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, and liquidation, as well as related litigation and corporate matters. Likewise, the firm provides out-of-court solutions, including mediation services. As firm founder Judith W. Ross recognized, this can be done well without the inefficiencies and expense all too common in Big Law. Each day, Ross, & Smith, PC attorneys prove this to be true—offering practical solutions to their clients’ legal problems, with excellence.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peter-lynn-&-partners.jpeg
Peter Lynn & Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-smith-binford.jpeg
Ross & Smith, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peter Lynn & Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ross & Smith, PC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peter Lynn & Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ross & Smith, PC in 2025.

Incident History — Peter Lynn & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peter Lynn & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ross & Smith, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ross & Smith, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peter-lynn-&-partners.jpeg
Peter Lynn & Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ross-smith-binford.jpeg
Ross & Smith, PC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Peter Lynn & Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ross & Smith, PC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ross & Smith, PC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peter Lynn & Partners company.

In the current year, Ross & Smith, PC company and Peter Lynn & Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ross & Smith, PC company nor Peter Lynn & Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ross & Smith, PC company nor Peter Lynn & Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ross & Smith, PC company nor Peter Lynn & Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners company nor Ross & Smith, PC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners company nor Ross & Smith, PC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peter Lynn & Partners company employs more people globally than Ross & Smith, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peter Lynn & Partners nor Ross & Smith, PC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X