Comparison Overview

Petaluma Health Center

VS

Lehigh Valley Health Network

Petaluma Health Center

1179 North McDowell Blvd, Petaluma, 94954, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 650 and 699

Petaluma Health Center's mission is to provide high quality health care with access for all in southern Sonoma County. *Petaluma Health Center is a six-time award winner in the North Bay Business Journal’s Best Places to Work for 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2009. *We were named as one of "Healthiest Companies in the North Bay"​ by North Bay Business Journal in 2015, 2016 and 2017. *Our staff members share the goal of offering patients the best possible care, and we are using a new, innovative “home team” care approach. Staff positions offer an outstanding benefits package including: Medical, dental, and vision care 401K, FSA, HSA Life insurance, AD&D, long-term disability Physician loan repayment and more.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 311
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Lehigh Valley Health Network

1200 S Cedar Crest Blvd, Allentown, Pennsylvania, US, 18103
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Lehigh Valley Health Network, part of Jefferson Health, is proud to be part of a leading integrated academic health care delivery system. Together, we’re among the top 15 not-for-profit health systems in the U.S., with 65,000 colleagues, 32 hospitals and more than 700 sites of care across eastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey. We’re committed to putting people first and pursuing excellence in over 95 clinical specialties, supported by a national doctoral research university and an expanded not-for-profit health plan.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,958
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petaluma-health-center.jpeg
Petaluma Health Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lvhn.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Petaluma Health Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lehigh Valley Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Petaluma Health Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lehigh Valley Health Network in 2026.

Incident History — Petaluma Health Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Petaluma Health Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lehigh Valley Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lehigh Valley Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petaluma-health-center.jpeg
Petaluma Health Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lvhn.jpeg
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lehigh Valley Health Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Petaluma Health Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Petaluma Health Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lehigh Valley Health Network company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lehigh Valley Health Network company and Petaluma Health Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Petaluma Health Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Petaluma Health Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lehigh Valley Health Network company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lehigh Valley Health Network company nor Petaluma Health Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Petaluma Health Center company nor Lehigh Valley Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lehigh Valley Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Petaluma Health Center company.

Lehigh Valley Health Network company employs more people globally than Petaluma Health Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Petaluma Health Center nor Lehigh Valley Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N