Comparison Overview

Perth Zoo

VS

Knoxville Zoo

Perth Zoo

20 Labouchere Rd, South Perth, WA, 6151, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The role and purpose of zoos have changed enormously in recent decades. As a modern zoo, Perth Zoo aims to provide visitors with the opportunity to encounter the natural world and to become involved in conservation action. Our vision, which inspires and directs our work, is for a world where diversity of species and habitats is secure. Our purpose as an organisation is to actively contribute to conservation. This is done through our research activities, support for wildlife projects, our animal breeding programs particularly breeding animals for release into the wild, wildlife rehabilitation, and partnerships with other groups and organisations. Perth Zoo also actively contributes to conservation through the work of its staff in field conservation, wildlife veterinary training, education programs and interpretation. We actively work to connect our visitors with ways that they can contribute to conservation. We do this by using the Zoo as a resource and a learning environment about conservation and environmental sustainability and by providing opportunities for visitor involvement. Our aims include connecting people with nature, inspiring in people a passion for conservation, and providing links and practical means for people to be active in conservation programs here at the Zoo and beyond our borders.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Knoxville Zoo

None
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Knoxville Zoo is a non-profit organization whose mission is to inspire action for wildlife and wild places through dynamic guest experiences. Accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), Knoxville Zoo welcomes more than 430,000 visitors annually and is Knoxville's most popular destination. The zoo works with other accredited zoos and organizations internationally to ensure the survival of more than 200 species. Knoxville Zoo is the most successful zoo in the world for the breeding of endangered red pandas, and is regarded for their work with critically endangered tortoises. Knoxville Zoo also serves as an educational resource for the East Tennessee region, welcoming thousands of students each year and inspiring a connection to the natural world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perth-zoo.jpeg
Perth Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Knoxville Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Perth Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Knoxville Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perth Zoo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knoxville Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — Perth Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perth Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Knoxville Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knoxville Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perth-zoo.jpeg
Perth Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Knoxville Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Knoxville Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Perth Zoo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Knoxville Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Perth Zoo company.

In the current year, Knoxville Zoo company and Perth Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Knoxville Zoo company nor Perth Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Knoxville Zoo company nor Perth Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Knoxville Zoo company nor Perth Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Perth Zoo company nor Knoxville Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Perth Zoo company nor Knoxville Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Perth Zoo company employs more people globally than Knoxville Zoo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Perth Zoo nor Knoxville Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H