Comparison Overview

Personal Insurance Federation of California

VS

Winter Equipment Company

Personal Insurance Federation of California

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

The Personal Insurance Federation of California is a Sacramento-based association of the leading property/casualty insurance companies on issues of homeowners, automobile, earthquake and flood insurance in California. PIFC’s focus is on personal insurance. While our member companies may offer various insurance products, PIFC does not represent them in matters such as healthcare, disability and workers’ compensation. Our member companies are Farmers Insurance Group, State Farm Insurance Companies, Progressive Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance, Liberty Mutual Group and Mercury Insurance. The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies is an Associate Member of PIFC. These companies collectively write the majority of the personal lines auto and home insurance in California. The mission of PIFC is to keep personal insurance affordable and available for consumers through state government advocacy and political action.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Winter Equipment Company

1900 Joseph Lloyd Road, Willoughby, Ohio, 44094, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

The Winter® Equipment Company is a leading manufacturer and distributor of quality wear parts for snowplows, road machinery, and equipment used in a variety of construction, mining and industrial markets. Our staff of wear parts specialists use innovative thinking, along with unique manufacturing techniques, to develop wear parts and services designed to greatly increase an industry’s production, reduce maintenance time and replacement costs. We pride ourselves in being the only snowplow wear parts manufacturer with a satisfaction guarantee.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/personal-insurance-federation-of-california.jpeg
Personal Insurance Federation of California
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winter-equipment-company.jpeg
Winter Equipment Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Personal Insurance Federation of California
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Winter Equipment Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Personal Insurance Federation of California in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Winter Equipment Company in 2025.

Incident History — Personal Insurance Federation of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Personal Insurance Federation of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Winter Equipment Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Winter Equipment Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/personal-insurance-federation-of-california.jpeg
Personal Insurance Federation of California
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winter-equipment-company.jpeg
Winter Equipment Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Personal Insurance Federation of California company and Winter Equipment Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Winter Equipment Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Personal Insurance Federation of California company.

In the current year, Winter Equipment Company company and Personal Insurance Federation of California company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Winter Equipment Company company nor Personal Insurance Federation of California company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Winter Equipment Company company nor Personal Insurance Federation of California company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Winter Equipment Company company nor Personal Insurance Federation of California company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California company nor Winter Equipment Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California company nor Winter Equipment Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Winter Equipment Company company employs more people globally than Personal Insurance Federation of California company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Personal Insurance Federation of California nor Winter Equipment Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N