Comparison Overview

Pérez Art Museum Miami

VS

Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria

Pérez Art Museum Miami

Museum Park, Miami, FL, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Pérez Art Museum Miami is a modern and contemporary art museum dedicated to collecting and exhibiting international art of the 20th and 21st centuries. Pérez Art Museum Miami serves one of the most diverse populations in one of the fastest growing regions in the country, where a unique confluence of Caribbean, North and South American cultures adds vibrancy and texture to the civic landscape. The city’s thriving community of artists, designers and collectors and its avid and growing art-engaged public are driving Miami’s demand for a world-class museum and dynamic center of visual arts education. The new PAMM transforms Museum Park into a central destination on Miami’s cultural map, promotes progressive arts education, builds community cohesiveness and contributes substantially to downtown revitalization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria

11 Nicholson St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Australian Museums and Galleries Association is the national membership association and peak advocacy body representing museums and galleries. Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria provides professional services to support Victorian museum and gallery communities. Our definition of a museum includes: * museums of science, history and art including galleries, Keeping Places and historical societies * natural, archaeological and ethnographic monuments and sites * institutions holding collections and specimens including botanical gardens, zoos and aquaria * science centres * cultural centres for tangible and/or intangible heritage, including digital creative activities

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perezartmuseummiami.jpeg
Pérez Art Museum Miami
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amaga-victoria.jpeg
Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pérez Art Museum Miami
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pérez Art Museum Miami in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria in 2026.

Incident History — Pérez Art Museum Miami (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pérez Art Museum Miami cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perezartmuseummiami.jpeg
Pérez Art Museum Miami
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amaga-victoria.jpeg
Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pérez Art Museum Miami company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pérez Art Museum Miami company.

In the current year, Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company and Pérez Art Museum Miami company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company nor Pérez Art Museum Miami company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company nor Pérez Art Museum Miami company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company nor Pérez Art Museum Miami company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami company nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami company nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pérez Art Museum Miami company employs more people globally than Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pérez Art Museum Miami nor Australian Museums and Galleries Association Victoria holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N