Comparison Overview

Per Capita Australia

VS

Planning and Conservation League

Per Capita Australia

Level 2, 673 Bourke Street, Melbourne, Vic, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Per Capita is an independent progressive think tank dedicated to building a new vision for Australia based on fairness, prosperity, community and social justice. Per Capita’s research is rigorous, evidence-based, and long-term in its outlook, considering the national challenges of the next decade rather than the next election cycle. We ask fresh questions and offer fresh answers, drawing on new thinking in science, economics and public policy. Our audience is the interested public, not just experts and practitioners. We engage all Australians who are keen to see the hard thinking done on the country’s future.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Planning and Conservation League

Sacramento, CA, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Planning and Conservation League (PCL) is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit lobbying organization devoted to enacting and implementing policies that protect and restore California’s environment at legislative and administrative levels. Since 1965, we’ve transformed the landscape of California, preserving its iconic forests, coastlines, mountains, and watersheds, and promoting open spaces, habitats, and healthy communities. Our work is officially recognized by official resolution of the State Legislature, affirming that "participation on every key environmental issue before the State Legislature has demonstrated PCL's effectiveness in preserving the quality of life for all Californians.” Join us in our mission to restore California’s natural landscapes and protect its people through policy and action.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/per-capita-australia.jpeg
Per Capita Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planningandconservationleague.jpeg
Planning and Conservation League
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Per Capita Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Planning and Conservation League
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Per Capita Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Planning and Conservation League in 2025.

Incident History — Per Capita Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Per Capita Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Planning and Conservation League (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Planning and Conservation League cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/per-capita-australia.jpeg
Per Capita Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planningandconservationleague.jpeg
Planning and Conservation League
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Planning and Conservation League company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Per Capita Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Planning and Conservation League company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Per Capita Australia company.

In the current year, Planning and Conservation League company and Per Capita Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Planning and Conservation League company nor Per Capita Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Planning and Conservation League company nor Per Capita Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Planning and Conservation League company nor Per Capita Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Per Capita Australia company nor Planning and Conservation League company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Per Capita Australia company nor Planning and Conservation League company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Per Capita Australia company employs more people globally than Planning and Conservation League company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Per Capita Australia nor Planning and Conservation League holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H