Comparison Overview

Pepperdine University School of Public Policy

VS

Center for Community Progress

Pepperdine University School of Public Policy

24255 Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu, ca, 90263, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu/

The School of Public Policy enrolls approximately 100 students and offers a Master of Public Policy (MPP) degree built on a distinctive philosophy of nurturing leaders to use the tools of analysis and policy design to effect successful implementation and real change. This requires critical insights balanced with personal moral certainties that only a broad exposure to great ideas, courageous thinkers, and extraordinary leaders can encourage. It prepares graduates for careers as leaders and seeks also to strengthen the institutions which lie between the federal government and the individual, including the family, religious organizations, volunteer associations, local and regional government, and nonprofit organizations. Joint degree programs include the MPP/JD degree and the MPP/MDR degree in conjunction with the School of Law and the MPP/MBA degree in conjunction with the Graziadio School of Business and Management. The Davenport Institute, the research and special program division of the School of Public Policy, is dedicated to addressing current issues through major conferences, seminars, and published research.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center for Community Progress

1001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.communityprogress.net

Center for Community Progress is the only national organization dedicated to the revitalization of vacant properties. We help meet the growing need in America's cities and towns for effective, sustainable solutions to turn vacant, abandoned and problem properties into vibrant places. Our work includes policy development, technical assistance and capacity building, research, advocacy, and network building. We also host the Reclaiming Vacant Properties Conference, bringing together hundreds of practitioners and policy makers to learn cutting edge strategies to revitalize vacant, abandoned, and problem properties.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pepperdine-university-school-of-public-policy.jpeg
Pepperdine University School of Public Policy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-community-progress.jpeg
Center for Community Progress
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pepperdine University School of Public Policy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Community Progress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pepperdine University School of Public Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Community Progress in 2025.

Incident History — Pepperdine University School of Public Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pepperdine University School of Public Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Community Progress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Community Progress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pepperdine-university-school-of-public-policy.jpeg
Pepperdine University School of Public Policy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-community-progress.jpeg
Center for Community Progress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Community Progress company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Community Progress company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company.

In the current year, Center for Community Progress company and Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Community Progress company nor Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Community Progress company nor Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Community Progress company nor Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company nor Center for Community Progress company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company nor Center for Community Progress company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pepperdine University School of Public Policy company employs more people globally than Center for Community Progress company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pepperdine University School of Public Policy nor Center for Community Progress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References