Comparison Overview

Pentangle Arts Council

VS

PinkPoleParty.org

Pentangle Arts Council

05091, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 800 and 849

Our mission is to present an exciting arts program for the enrichment of our community and schools. Through our work and with strong community support, Woodstock has become a small town with a rich cultural tradition. Situated on the village green, Woodstock's Historic Town Hall Theatre is Pentangle's base of operations. Evoking the glamour of Hollywood's golden age and its vintage movie palaces, the audience experience begins upon entering this special setting. be sure to experience it the next time you are in Woodstock!

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PinkPoleParty.org

2422 W. Victory Boulevard, Burbank, California, 91506, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We are a 4600sf Pole-Fitness instruction "Mega Center". The largest in Southern CA. We feat. a 17 pole classroom, Aerial hoops & lyra classroom, self-defense, ballroom, belly dance, fitness lounge, kitchen, lockers, showers, & more! Our mission is to donate profits to A.C.S. Breast Cancer Research. Inspiriring women of all ages and sizes to Dance for the Cause so we can Donate for the Cure!

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Pentangle Arts Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinkpoleparty-org.jpeg
PinkPoleParty.org
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pentangle Arts Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PinkPoleParty.org
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pentangle Arts Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PinkPoleParty.org in 2025.

Incident History — Pentangle Arts Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pentangle Arts Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PinkPoleParty.org (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PinkPoleParty.org cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Pentangle Arts Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinkpoleparty-org.jpeg
PinkPoleParty.org
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pentangle Arts Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PinkPoleParty.org company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PinkPoleParty.org company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pentangle Arts Council company.

In the current year, PinkPoleParty.org company and Pentangle Arts Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PinkPoleParty.org company nor Pentangle Arts Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PinkPoleParty.org company nor Pentangle Arts Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PinkPoleParty.org company nor Pentangle Arts Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council company nor PinkPoleParty.org company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council company nor PinkPoleParty.org company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pentangle Arts Council company employs more people globally than PinkPoleParty.org company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pentangle Arts Council nor PinkPoleParty.org holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N