Comparison Overview

Penta Global Engineering

VS

Petron Engineering Construction Limited

Penta Global Engineering

Electra Street, Abu Dhabi, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Penta Global we deliver innovative, sustainable EPC solutions to the ever-evolving energy sector across the Middle East, Southeast Asia and beyond. Founded in the UK and headquartered in the UAE, we have two decades of rich experience in construction, spearheading the rising demand for global energy conversions that are delivered with safety quality and sustainability at the core. We execute large scale construction projects efficiently, on schedule and with a laser focus on safety and quality as showcased with our internationally recognised accreditations, and proven track record with IOC’s and NOC’s all around the world. We recruit truly exceptional talent within the industry, putting our people at the heart of our fast-growing business. Our core values are intrinsic to our goals to ensure that we are delivering strategic, sustainable and innovative energy solutions that align with the highest industry standards.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 976
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Petron Engineering Construction Limited

Mumbai, Mumbai, IN, 400071
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Petron Engineering Construction Limited is a reputed name in the field of Engineering & Construction of Refinery, Cement and Power Projects. It offers innovative solutions for EPC Power Projects, Fired Heaters and installation of Refineries, Petrochemicals, Fertilizers, Power and Cement Plants.The revenues for FY 2009-2010 were about 5700 million INR.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penta-global-engineering.jpeg
Penta Global Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petron-engineering-construction-limited.jpeg
Petron Engineering Construction Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Penta Global Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Petron Engineering Construction Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penta Global Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Petron Engineering Construction Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Penta Global Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penta Global Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Petron Engineering Construction Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Petron Engineering Construction Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penta-global-engineering.jpeg
Penta Global Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petron-engineering-construction-limited.jpeg
Petron Engineering Construction Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Penta Global Engineering company and Petron Engineering Construction Limited company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Petron Engineering Construction Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Penta Global Engineering company.

In the current year, Petron Engineering Construction Limited company and Penta Global Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Petron Engineering Construction Limited company nor Penta Global Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Petron Engineering Construction Limited company nor Penta Global Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Petron Engineering Construction Limited company nor Penta Global Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Penta Global Engineering company nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Penta Global Engineering company nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Petron Engineering Construction Limited company employs more people globally than Penta Global Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Penta Global Engineering nor Petron Engineering Construction Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H