Comparison Overview

Pensacola Sign

VS

Dove Direct

Pensacola Sign

3711 N. Palafox St., Pensacola, 32505, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://pensacolasign.com

Pensacola Sign and Graphics, Inc. has been producing creative and original signs in Pensacola since 1994. We produce full color graphic imaging and signage for corporate and business applications. This includes vehicle wraps, trade show exhibits, point of purchase, posters, banners, wraps, architectural wayfinding, window graphics, and site and utility signs. We also provide professional image and logo design, installation, packaging and shipping services. Project management on custom installations and corporate branding campaigns is available.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Dove Direct

5601 Fulton Industrial Blvd., Atlanta, Georgia, 30336, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dovedirect.com/linkedin-connect

Dove Direct provides direct marketing and mail services that move your business and marketing communications forward. We’re an end-to-end solutions company powered by new technologies designed to help you connect with your customers wherever they are in the most cost efficient manner. Based in the Southeast, we were founded in 1987 and are owned by Joyce and Harvey Newton. We serve local and international customers across several industries including automotive, education, financial services, healthcare, utilities and government. Our clients include Fortune 500, state and local Government, political candidates, and leading retail and service providers across various industry segments. As one of the largest fully automated MLOCR Presort Bureaus in the region, we offer our customers a complete line of integrated solutions with significant “bottom line” savings. Solutions Data Management, CRM, Variable Digital Printing, Transpromo Messaging, Direct Mail, Letter Shop & Fulfillment, Security Printing, Web to Print, Wide Format Printing, Mass Mailings, Fully Automated MLOCR Presort Bureau, 1st and Standard Class Mailing, Barcode Presorting, Marketing Support, Production Management Support, Secure Data Life Cycle Management, Shipping and Logistics.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pensacola-sign.jpeg
Pensacola Sign
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dove-direct.jpeg
Dove Direct
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pensacola Sign
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dove Direct
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pensacola Sign in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dove Direct in 2025.

Incident History — Pensacola Sign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pensacola Sign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dove Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dove Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pensacola-sign.jpeg
Pensacola Sign
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dove-direct.jpeg
Dove Direct
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dove Direct company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pensacola Sign company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dove Direct company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pensacola Sign company.

In the current year, Dove Direct company and Pensacola Sign company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dove Direct company nor Pensacola Sign company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dove Direct company nor Pensacola Sign company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dove Direct company nor Pensacola Sign company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pensacola Sign company nor Dove Direct company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pensacola Sign company nor Dove Direct company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dove Direct company employs more people globally than Pensacola Sign company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pensacola Sign nor Dove Direct holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References