Comparison Overview

Pennsauken Township

VS

Department for Education

Pennsauken Township

5605 N Crescent Blvd, Pennsauken, New Jersey, 08110, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Strong

Pennsauken is 12.8 Sq. miles with 35,000 residents. It is urban and suburban in nature. There are three active maritime locations and numerous industries in the town.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Department for Education

Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London, England, GB, SW1P 3BT
Last Update: 2025-07-26 (UTC)

Help us achieve world-class education, training and care for everyone, whatever their background. Whether you're just starting out, or an experienced professional, we have what you are looking for. Jobs include administration, policy advisers, digital, finance, commercial specialists and many more. You'll help shape the future of education, training and social care, by working with industry and education leaders to develop policies and services. We have offices across England, including in Manchester, Sheffield, Bristol, Leeds, Gatehead, Cambridge, London, Darlington, Nottingham and Coventry. We offer part-time, term-time and flexible working patterns, including working from home. You'll be able to shape your own learning and development with plenty of options available, and get involved with work across government, as well as in your local community. You can use your paid volunteer days to take on projects that matter to you.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 36,597
Subsidiaries: 66
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
17
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsauken-township.jpeg
Pennsauken Township
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-department-for-education.jpeg
Department for Education
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pennsauken Township
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Department for Education
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pennsauken Township in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Department for Education has 44.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Pennsauken Township (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pennsauken Township cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Department for Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsauken-township.jpeg
Pennsauken Township
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-department-for-education.jpeg
Department for Education
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Insecure Data Handling, Improper Access Controls, Accidental Publication
Motivation: Negligence, Operational Failures, Potential Espionage (for Afghan/PSNI breaches), Financial Gain (for dark web sales of leaked data)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: human error (accidental data sharing via spreadsheet)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Students), Exploitation of Weak Security Practices, Use of Downloaded Hacking Tools, Misuse of Staff Credentials
Motivation: Dares, Notoriety, Financial Gain, Revenge, Rivalries, Testing Skills/Knowledge
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Pennsauken Township company and Department for Education company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Department for Education company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Pennsauken Township company has not reported any.

In the current year, Department for Education company has reported more cyber incidents than Pennsauken Township company.

Neither Department for Education company nor Pennsauken Township company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Department for Education company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Pennsauken Township company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Education company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Pennsauken Township company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pennsauken Township company nor Department for Education company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Department for Education company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pennsauken Township company.

Department for Education company employs more people globally than Pennsauken Township company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X