Comparison Overview

Penn Libraries

VS

Richmond Hill Public Library

Penn Libraries

3420 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, 19104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.library.upenn.edu/

The Penn Libraries serves the world-class faculty and students of Penn’s 12 schools. We partner with communities at Penn and beyond to produce, preserve, and provide access to knowledge. Together we build dynamic resources, tools, and expertise that inspire critical inquiry and creative expression. Collections at the Penn Libraries comprise more than 8.3 million volumes, over 192,000 journals, some 3.5 million digitized images, and extraordinary rare and unique materials that document the intellectual and cultural experience of ancient and modern civilizations.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Richmond Hill Public Library

1 Atkinson St, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
https://www.rhpl.ca/

Richmond Hill Public Library is a place for all. Steeped in history, we’ve proudly served our local community for 166 years. Our four branches represent an inclusive gateway to knowledge for all those who step through our physical and virtual doors, where people of all backgrounds, ages, and beliefs are welcome, and encouraged, to celebrate their curiosity. Richmond Hill Public Library offers educational and information resources with a progressive user-oriented library service. Job seekers, small business owners, or those wishing to enhance their professional skills can attend a library program, access free online resources like Lynda.com, or check out the latest professional resources in your field. Our library is growing alongside our vibrant community. We invite you to explore a career with Richmond Hill Public Library; join our team and help us celebrate curiosity!

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penn-libraries.jpeg
Penn Libraries
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richmond-hill-public-library.jpeg
Richmond Hill Public Library
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Penn Libraries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Richmond Hill Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penn Libraries in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richmond Hill Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Penn Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penn Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Richmond Hill Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richmond Hill Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penn-libraries.jpeg
Penn Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richmond-hill-public-library.jpeg
Richmond Hill Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Penn Libraries company and Richmond Hill Public Library company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Richmond Hill Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Penn Libraries company.

In the current year, Richmond Hill Public Library company and Penn Libraries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Richmond Hill Public Library company nor Penn Libraries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Richmond Hill Public Library company nor Penn Libraries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Richmond Hill Public Library company nor Penn Libraries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Penn Libraries company nor Richmond Hill Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Penn Libraries company nor Richmond Hill Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Richmond Hill Public Library company employs more people globally than Penn Libraries company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Penn Libraries nor Richmond Hill Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References