Comparison Overview

PENN Interactive

VS

Foxwoods Resort Casino

PENN Interactive

1818 Market St, None, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19103
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Penn Interactive (PI) is an interactive gaming company headquartered in Philadelphia,PA with offices in Greenfield, MA, and Cherry Hill, NJ. As the digital arm of PENN Entertainment (NASDAQ: PENN), North America’s leading provider of integrated entertainment, sports content, and casino gaming experiences, we are poised for fast-paced growth in the sports betting and online casino space. We have teamed up with theScore to create a unique and exciting sports betting experience through our retail books and the Sportsbook mobile apps.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 338
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foxwoods Resort Casino

350 Trolley Line Boulevard, Mashantucket, CT, 06338, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Foxwoods Resort Casino, the largest resort casino in the Northeast, has set the standard for innovation and excellence in gaming and hospitality for over 33 years. Owned and operated by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, Foxwoods continues to redefine the resort experience by seamlessly blending of world-class gaming, award-winning dining, top-tier entertainment, and family-friendly attractions. A destination like no other, Foxwoods offers over 2,200 luxury hotel rooms, a 30,000-square-foot expo space, on-site shopping at Tanger, and one of the most expansive gaming floors in the country. The resort’s entertainment portfolio features globally acclaimed artists, exclusive live performances, and premier events hosted at its renowned venues, including the Premier Theater and Great Cedar Showroom, which draw audiences year-round. Through strategic partnerships with leading brands like DraftKings Sportsbook, Hell’s Kitchen, and Great Wolf Lodge, Foxwoods continues to expand its offerings and deliver elevated, curated experiences for guests. The new brand campaign, “This Is How We Resort,” reflects Foxwoods’ commitment to creating unique, personalized moments—from thrilling gaming adventures to relaxing escapes—that redefine what it means to “resort”. For more information, visit www.foxwoods.com. As a large employer in Connecticut, we welcome you to see what career opportunity Foxwoods has to offer on Foxwoods.com/careers

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 2,299
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penn-interactive-pi.jpeg
PENN Interactive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxwoods-resort-casino.jpeg
Foxwoods Resort Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PENN Interactive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foxwoods Resort Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PENN Interactive in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foxwoods Resort Casino in 2025.

Incident History — PENN Interactive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PENN Interactive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foxwoods Resort Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxwoods Resort Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penn-interactive-pi.jpeg
PENN Interactive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxwoods-resort-casino.jpeg
Foxwoods Resort Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foxwoods Resort Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PENN Interactive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foxwoods Resort Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PENN Interactive company.

In the current year, Foxwoods Resort Casino company and PENN Interactive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foxwoods Resort Casino company nor PENN Interactive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foxwoods Resort Casino company nor PENN Interactive company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foxwoods Resort Casino company nor PENN Interactive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PENN Interactive company nor Foxwoods Resort Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PENN Interactive company nor Foxwoods Resort Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foxwoods Resort Casino company employs more people globally than PENN Interactive company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PENN Interactive nor Foxwoods Resort Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H