Comparison Overview

Pen & Pad Publishing LLC

VS

Cambridge Law Review

Pen & Pad Publishing LLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We're an indie book publisher in the DC metropolitan area, here to help you stop dreaming about becoming a published author and actually make it happen. As an independent publisher, we are not influenced or controlled by the Big Six publishing houses and can offer authors another avenue for publication. Indie publishers are responsible for almost half the books published annually. But signing with an independent publisher isn't for everyone. If you are passionate about the story you have to tell, a self-starter and not opposed to some guerilla-style marketing to get your book into the hands of the masses, Pen & Pad Publishing may be the place for you to stop dreaming about becoming a published author and to actually make it happen.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cambridge Law Review

10 West Road, Cambridge, England, GB, CB3 9DZ
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Cambridge Law Review is a student-run law journal serving as an academic forum for contemporary and cutting-edge legal issues. The journal welcomes contributions from around the world, and acts as a research springboard and tool for academics, lawyers, and students of law alike. Co Editors-in-Chief for Volume 11 (2025-26): Kaden Pradhan and Thomas Loke Zhih Hahn; Editor-in-Chief for Volumes 9 (2023-24) and 10 (2024-25): Wednesday Eden

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pen-&-pad-publishing-llc.jpeg
Pen & Pad Publishing LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-law-review.jpeg
Cambridge Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pen & Pad Publishing LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cambridge Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pen & Pad Publishing LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Pen & Pad Publishing LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pen & Pad Publishing LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cambridge Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pen-&-pad-publishing-llc.jpeg
Pen & Pad Publishing LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridge-law-review.jpeg
Cambridge Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cambridge Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cambridge Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company.

In the current year, Cambridge Law Review company and Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cambridge Law Review company nor Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cambridge Law Review company nor Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cambridge Law Review company nor Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company nor Cambridge Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company nor Cambridge Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cambridge Law Review company employs more people globally than Pen & Pad Publishing LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pen & Pad Publishing LLC nor Cambridge Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.