Comparison Overview

Pegasus Interprint

VS

Phase 3 Media and Communications

Pegasus Interprint

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We have the expertise and experience in delivering end-to-end print production and management solutions that deliver lower costs and increased profits . • Commercial Digital, Sheetfed & Web Printing • Data & Mailing Services • Online Ordering system Design & Development • Fulfillment and Inventory Management Solutions • Promotional Products Design and Marketing • Print Management & Consultation

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phase 3 Media and Communications

123 Lehigh Drive, Fairfield, NJ, 07004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

FLM Graphics Corporation and the FLM group of companies have been a leading provider of commercial printing, digital imaging, reprographics, document management, and integrated graphic communications services since 1972. FLM operates printing, imaging and reprographic production operations, facilities management, customer support, and sales offices in Fairfield and Princeton, New Jersey; New York City; Marlborough, Massachusetts; and Frederick, Maryland. In addition to its commercial offset and digital printing operations, FLM Graphics offers large format imaging & printing through its Trucolor™ business unit and provides custom programmed web-portal and e-business management solutions through its Access Images™ technology program and support group. FLM’s innovation in providing software-as-a-service (SAS) programs has been behind major initiatives for multi-national corporate clients implementing customized web-to-print, interactive marketing portals, and media inventory & asset management solutions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pegasus-interprint.jpeg
Pegasus Interprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flm-graphics.jpeg
Phase 3 Media and Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pegasus Interprint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phase 3 Media and Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pegasus Interprint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phase 3 Media and Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Pegasus Interprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pegasus Interprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phase 3 Media and Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phase 3 Media and Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pegasus-interprint.jpeg
Pegasus Interprint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flm-graphics.jpeg
Phase 3 Media and Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pegasus Interprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Phase 3 Media and Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phase 3 Media and Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pegasus Interprint company.

In the current year, Phase 3 Media and Communications company and Pegasus Interprint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phase 3 Media and Communications company nor Pegasus Interprint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phase 3 Media and Communications company nor Pegasus Interprint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phase 3 Media and Communications company nor Pegasus Interprint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pegasus Interprint company nor Phase 3 Media and Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pegasus Interprint company nor Phase 3 Media and Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phase 3 Media and Communications company employs more people globally than Pegasus Interprint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pegasus Interprint nor Phase 3 Media and Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N