Comparison Overview

Peermont Global

VS

Palace Casino Resort

Peermont Global

64 Jones Rd, Kempton Park, 1620, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Peermont Hotels, Casinos and Resorts is an award-winning hospitality and entertainment company which operates 12 properties located across South Africa and Botswana. Renowned for its excellence in design, development, management, ownership and operation of multi-faceted hospitality and gaming facilities, guests partake in fine dining, relaxing hotel stays, exciting casino action, live entertainment, soothing spa treatments, efficient conferencing, or sporting activities – offered in unique safe and secure, themed settings. Peermont’s competitive status and industry leading margins are driven by a strong, entrepreneurial management team and capable staffing complement, all driven by unique corporate values and a desire to succeed – in an ongoing quest for exceptional service and a guest-centric approach. Peermont respects and harnesses the traditions and support of local communities, in local shareholding as well as local recruitment, and is the gaming and hospitality industry leader in sustainable corporate social investment and responsibility initiatives. Most recently, Peermont launched its first online venture, PalaceBet, which offers a wide spread on all major sports, including soccer, rugby, cricket, boxing, and motorsport from a variety of leagues around the globe. Complementing their offering, PalaceBet also offers online fixed odds betting live games from popular developers BetGames and Evolution Gaming. Peermont continues to garner numerous awards which are only made possible by feedback from guests and delivery by staff – a focus on the recognized company purpose - creating exceptional memories by delivering relaxing stays and exciting times.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 858
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Palace Casino Resort

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Palace Casino Resort is the only smoke free casino on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and the premiere destination for luxurious accommodations, superior guest service and endless excitement. Nestled along the beautiful Gulf of Mexico and Biloxi’s Back Bay, the resort offers hotel rooms and suites with stunning views, award winning restaurants, non-stop gaming, championship golf at The Preserve Golf Club and amazing amenities to complement your stay.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peermont-global.jpeg
Peermont Global
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palace-casino-resort.jpeg
Palace Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peermont Global
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Palace Casino Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peermont Global in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palace Casino Resort in 2025.

Incident History — Peermont Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peermont Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Palace Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palace Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peermont-global.jpeg
Peermont Global
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palace-casino-resort.jpeg
Palace Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Peermont Global company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Palace Casino Resort company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Palace Casino Resort company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peermont Global company.

In the current year, Palace Casino Resort company and Peermont Global company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Palace Casino Resort company nor Peermont Global company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Palace Casino Resort company nor Peermont Global company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Palace Casino Resort company nor Peermont Global company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peermont Global company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peermont Global company nor Palace Casino Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peermont Global company employs more people globally than Palace Casino Resort company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peermont Global nor Palace Casino Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H