Comparison Overview

Peel Label Inc

VS

PCP

Peel Label Inc

Mississauga, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.peellabel.com

Peel Label is a Canadian owned and operated custom manufacturer of high quality pressure sensitve labels, coupons and tags. Peel Label started business in 1978, which makes our 35 year solid reputation founded on quality, service with a committment to our customers and finding effective solutions to an ever changing market. Call or email us today for a competitive quote on your labels!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PCP

Unit 18 - 19, Seaway Parade Industrial Park, SA12 7BR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pcp.biz

Hi there, we’re PCP, formally known as Pugh's Colourprint. We're a professional Print and Finishing company based in Wales. We print anything from corporate stationery to point of sale and exhibition displays. Our team has over 100 years’ combined experience in the print industry and is always available for a chat, whether its to discuss a new project, request a quote or simply advice. But enough about us, let’s talk about you. Whether you own a business or manage print for clients, you need an all-purpose print service that takes care of you, so you can relax and focus on your job. We want to make it easy for you, we're consistent, reliable and perform the majority of jobs in house so your print is in our control at all times. We have a range of printing and finishing techniques to choose from; but if you can’t find what you’re looking for, get in touch and we’ll see if we can help. Services Whatever you require in print, we can help. From corporate print to point of sale, we have a great portfolio of products to choose from.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 191
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Peel Label Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcp.jpeg
PCP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peel Label Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PCP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peel Label Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCP in 2025.

Incident History — Peel Label Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peel Label Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PCP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Peel Label Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcp.jpeg
PCP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Peel Label Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PCP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PCP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peel Label Inc company.

In the current year, PCP company and Peel Label Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PCP company nor Peel Label Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PCP company nor Peel Label Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PCP company nor Peel Label Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peel Label Inc company nor PCP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peel Label Inc company nor PCP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PCP company employs more people globally than Peel Label Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peel Label Inc nor PCP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References