Comparison Overview

PedidosYa

VS

GlobalLogic

PedidosYa

La Cumparsita 1475, 11200 Montevideo, Departamento de Montevideo, Montevideo, Montevideo, UY, 11200
Last Update: 2026-01-19

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is available for iOS, Android and Windows Phone operating systems and downloads are now over 20 million.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 13,651
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GlobalLogic

2535 Augustine Drive, 5th Floor, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95054
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 700 and 749

GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group company, is a trusted partner in design, data, and digital engineering for the world’s largest and most innovative companies. Since our inception in 2000, we have been at the forefront of the digital revolution, helping to create some of the most widely used digital products and experiences. Our purpose is to positively impact society and the planet through cutting-edge technology. Together with our clients, we are engineering impact through intelligent products, platforms, and services that are designed for desirability, engineered for excellence, and curated for intelligence. Our people-first culture fosters shoulder-to-shoulder teamwork, supported by a unique lab model and flexible delivery options, including onshore, nearshore, and offshore solutions. We also prioritize environmental stewardship in our product development and are committed to leveraging the diversity of thoughts as a driver for business innovation, attracting and developing talent, and sustainable growth. We are proud of our global recognitions: Leader in the ISG Provider Lens™ Digital Engineering Services 2024 U.S. report Everest Group's Software Product Engineering Services Peak Matrix 2024 Star Performer in Major Contender in Everest Group’s Trust & Safety Peak Matrix 2024 2024 EcoVadis Silver Sustainability Rating Join us as we continue to shape the future of digital engineering and create lasting impacts for businesses and communities worldwide: globallogic.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 34,684
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pedidosya.jpeg
PedidosYa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globallogic.jpeg
GlobalLogic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PedidosYa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GlobalLogic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PedidosYa in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GlobalLogic in 2026.

Incident History — PedidosYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PedidosYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GlobalLogic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GlobalLogic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pedidosya.jpeg
PedidosYa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globallogic.jpeg
GlobalLogic
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Extortion (unconfirmed ransom demand)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

PedidosYa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GlobalLogic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

GlobalLogic company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PedidosYa company has not reported any.

In the current year, GlobalLogic company and PedidosYa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

GlobalLogic company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PedidosYa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor PedidosYa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor PedidosYa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

GlobalLogic company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PedidosYa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PedidosYa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GlobalLogic company.

GlobalLogic company employs more people globally than PedidosYa company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PedidosYa nor GlobalLogic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N