Comparison Overview

Pearson Clinical Assessments

VS

Jeugdhulp Friesland

Pearson Clinical Assessments

None, None, San Antonio, Texas, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-16

Since our establishment in 1921, we have been committed to providing quality assessments, efficient testing procedures and valid and reliable information to help all individuals succeed. We develop and distribute tests and related products for professionals in psychology, health, business, general education, bilingual education, special education, and other areas serving people of all ages and cultures. We are committed to meeting the diverse needs of our customers through our people, service, innovation, and technology. We are dedicated to the pursuit of professional excellence, leadership, and growth through acquisition, development, publication, and the maintenance of quality assessment tools in order to anticipate and meet the needs of our customers.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 716
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jeugdhulp Friesland

Badweg 4, Leeuwarden, 8934 AA, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Stichting Jeugdhulp Friesland is een organisatie voor geindiceerde jeugdzorg in de provincie Friesland. Deze zorg omvat orthopedagogische behandeling en opvang aan kinderen (0-12 jaar), jeugdigen (12-18 jaar) en hun ouders/opvoeders bij vragen en problemen rond opgroeien en opvoeden. De vragen en problemen varieren in ernst en omvang. In het verlengde daarvan varieert ook het behandelaanbod: van lichte ambulante tot zeer intensieve en specialistische behandelvormen. Jeugdhulp Friesland biedt ook intensieve residentiele behandeleing voor kinderen en jeugdigen met complexe problematiek (GGZ-behandeling).

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 468
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pearson-clinical-assessments.jpeg
Pearson Clinical Assessments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeugdhulp-friesland.jpeg
Jeugdhulp Friesland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pearson Clinical Assessments
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jeugdhulp Friesland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pearson Clinical Assessments in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jeugdhulp Friesland in 2026.

Incident History — Pearson Clinical Assessments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pearson Clinical Assessments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jeugdhulp Friesland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jeugdhulp Friesland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pearson-clinical-assessments.jpeg
Pearson Clinical Assessments
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeugdhulp-friesland.jpeg
Jeugdhulp Friesland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pearson Clinical Assessments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jeugdhulp Friesland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jeugdhulp Friesland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pearson Clinical Assessments company.

In the current year, Jeugdhulp Friesland company and Pearson Clinical Assessments company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jeugdhulp Friesland company nor Pearson Clinical Assessments company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jeugdhulp Friesland company nor Pearson Clinical Assessments company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jeugdhulp Friesland company nor Pearson Clinical Assessments company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments company nor Jeugdhulp Friesland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments company nor Jeugdhulp Friesland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pearson Clinical Assessments company employs more people globally than Jeugdhulp Friesland company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pearson Clinical Assessments nor Jeugdhulp Friesland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H