Comparison Overview

Peacock Keller, LLP

VS

Solomon Law Firm, PLLC

Peacock Keller, LLP

95 West Beau Street, Washington, Pennsylvania, 15301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Peacock Keller is a full service law firm headquartered in Washington, Pennsylvania. The firm has served the legal needs of both corporate and individual clients for over 90 years. Our attorneys provide legal representation and mediation services in the areas of business, litigation, energy, employment law, estate & trusts, real estate, personal injury and school law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Solomon Law Firm, PLLC

1025 Connecticut Avenue NW, Ste 1000, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Solomon Law Firm, PLLC, endeavors to exceed our clients’ expectations in all facets of legal representation. Our attorneys strive to be recognized as the most sought after providers of legal services for the employment law cases that matter. In pursuit of this objective we practice law to obtain superior results and represent clients with tenacity, professionalism, and integrity. Our firm prides itself on its technological sophistication, efficiency, and responsiveness to client objectives. For those cases that present profoundly important normative implications for justice, we’ll litigate just for the sport of it

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peacock-keller-&-ecker-llp.jpeg
Peacock Keller, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solomon-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Solomon Law Firm, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peacock Keller, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Solomon Law Firm, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peacock Keller, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solomon Law Firm, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Peacock Keller, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peacock Keller, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Solomon Law Firm, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solomon Law Firm, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peacock-keller-&-ecker-llp.jpeg
Peacock Keller, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solomon-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Solomon Law Firm, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Peacock Keller, LLP company and Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peacock Keller, LLP company.

In the current year, Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company and Peacock Keller, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company nor Peacock Keller, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company nor Peacock Keller, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company nor Peacock Keller, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP company nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP company nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peacock Keller, LLP company employs more people globally than Solomon Law Firm, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peacock Keller, LLP nor Solomon Law Firm, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X