Comparison Overview

Peacock & Co Solicitors

VS

Weyand Law Firm

Peacock & Co Solicitors

94 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London, GB, SW19 5EG
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Since Peacock & Co was founded in Wimbledon Village in 1991, we have gained a reputation for providing clear, practical and reliable legal advice throughout South West London. As a result, we have built a strong base of loyal clients, many of whom have been kind enough to recommend our services to others. Most of our new clients come to us by personal referral either from existing clients or fellow professionals such as accountants, financial advisors, surveyors and estate agents. In 2017, we opened a second office in Epsom enabling us to offer clients from further afield our approachable service, particularly in Surrey. The expert lawyers in our Wimbledon and Epsom offices would be delighted to provide you with friendly, professional and cost-effective legal advice on both your personal and business matters. 94 High Street Wimbledon Village London SW19 5EG Tel: 020 8944 5290 Park Place House 24 Church Street, Epsom, KT17 4QB Tel: 020 8035 0388 [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Weyand Law Firm

540 Pacific Ave., San Francisco, CA, 94133, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Weyand Law Firm is a San Francisco based law firm that provides comprehensive legal services in four areas of practice including real estate, IP/technology, business and environmental litigation. We pride ourselves on delivering exemplary legal services that are customized to meet specific individualized needs. Regardless of the circumstance, we will be there to help every step of the way providing guidance in the legal process, protecting our clients’ interests and offering them the services they desire. We commit ourselves to every single client and our success can be attributed to our teamwork, attentiveness, creativeness and dedication.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peacock-co-solicitors.jpeg
Peacock & Co Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weyand-law-firm.jpeg
Weyand Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peacock & Co Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Weyand Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peacock & Co Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weyand Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Peacock & Co Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peacock & Co Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Weyand Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weyand Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peacock-co-solicitors.jpeg
Peacock & Co Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weyand-law-firm.jpeg
Weyand Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Weyand Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peacock & Co Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Weyand Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peacock & Co Solicitors company.

In the current year, Weyand Law Firm company and Peacock & Co Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Weyand Law Firm company nor Peacock & Co Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Weyand Law Firm company nor Peacock & Co Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Weyand Law Firm company nor Peacock & Co Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors company nor Weyand Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors company nor Weyand Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peacock & Co Solicitors company employs more people globally than Weyand Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peacock & Co Solicitors nor Weyand Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X