Comparison Overview

pe law

VS

Compex Legal Services

pe law

4/97 Hyde St, Footscray, Victoria, AU, 3011
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Barnaby McIlrath founded PE Law in 2019. He is an accredited specialist in Planning and Environment Law with over 20 years experience in practice. He has appeared in hundreds of matters before VCAT and Planning Panels Victoria, as well as acting in appeals and judicial review proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria. PE Law can review and draft complex planning agreements, biodiversity offset agreements, planning scheme controls and environmental management plans. We offer a strategic approach to engagement with regulators, local government and statutory authorities. We are also experienced at drafting and reviewing environmental provisions in property transactions, infrastructure agreements and share purchase agreements. For futher details please visit our website (www.pelaw.com.au) or get in touch. Recent matters of interest: - Freeway service centre: BWK Properties v Macedon Ranges SC [2021] VCAT 686 - Residential aged care facility in Sorrento: Matthies Property Investments v Mornington Peninsula Shire Council [2022] VCAT 535 - 87 lot subdivsion in Kyneton South: St Leonards Property Holdings v Macedon Ranges SC [2022] VCAT 26 - EPBC Act advice: advise owner of industrial land on EPBC Act obligations concerning listed grassland communities - Truck storage facility opposite Western Freeway (Priority Projects Standing Advisory Committee) - act for valuation authority in several valuation disputes concerning open space equalisation payments and revaluation of broadacre land in growth corridors - act for joint venture comprising 5 councils in relation to compulsory acquisition of a part of a landfill - act for landowner in relation to the Wonthaggi North East Precinct Structure Plan - Treetop adventure facility: act for proponent of adventure recreation facility before Planning Panels Victoria - act in several matters involving s36 easements under the Subdivision Act 1988

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compex Legal Services

325 Maple Avenue, None, Torrance, California, US, 90503
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Compex Legal Services accelerates insights to solve claims through the power of technology. We are the industry leader in record retrieval, medical record insights, medical canvassing, and court reporting services. Enabled by industry-leading technology, we empower clients to retrieve the records they need—and capture the insights within them—faster and more cost-effectively. We serve more than 500 insurance companies and 3,000 law firms nationwide.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 346
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pe-law.jpeg
pe law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
pe law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Compex Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for pe law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compex Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — pe law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

pe law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Compex Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compex Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pe-law.jpeg
pe law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compex-legal-services.jpeg
Compex Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

pe law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Compex Legal Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Compex Legal Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas pe law company has not reported any.

In the current year, Compex Legal Services company and pe law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Compex Legal Services company nor pe law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Compex Legal Services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while pe law company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Compex Legal Services company nor pe law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither pe law company nor Compex Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither pe law company nor Compex Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Compex Legal Services company employs more people globally than pe law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither pe law nor Compex Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X