Comparison Overview

PCS Mobile

VS

Doggone Computers

PCS Mobile

4949 South Syracuse Street, Denver, CO, 80237, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.route1.com/

PCS Mobile, a Route1 Inc. company is a global leader in full end-to-end mobile technology solutions, providing project lifecycle services across all sectors and vertical industries. We will design, deliver and implement the very best industry-leading solutions including license plate recognition systems (LPR), hardware, in-vehicle system integration, project service support, pre-deployment and post-deployment services, asset management, customer support helpdesk and beyond — PCS Mobile has mastered the true challenges of mobility through understanding the key elements required for a successful mobile deployment. By completely immersing ourselves in the goals and initiatives of our client's business, we truly become an extension of each client's organization guaranteeing our customers are receiving exceptional value, return on investment, and a trusted long-lasting partnership.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Doggone Computers

2816 Fairhauser Ct., Napervlle, IL 60564, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doggonecomputers.com

Operation, maintenance, recovery and security of small business and home networks, including mail, DHCP, DNS and database servers. General computer repair and upgrades. Router configuration. Family heritage video transfers from vhs to DVD. Created and maintained web site pages for Chicago Fire Juniors Soccer Club, Team Chicago Soccer Club and a wide variety of clients, using HTML and web graphics. Developed an animated web based spelling game for children using vbscript and hmtl. Used scripts for church member database maintenance.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcs-mobile.jpeg
PCS Mobile
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doggone-computers.jpeg
Doggone Computers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PCS Mobile
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Doggone Computers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCS Mobile in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doggone Computers in 2025.

Incident History — PCS Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCS Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Doggone Computers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doggone Computers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcs-mobile.jpeg
PCS Mobile
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doggone-computers.jpeg
Doggone Computers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Doggone Computers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PCS Mobile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Doggone Computers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PCS Mobile company.

In the current year, Doggone Computers company and PCS Mobile company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Doggone Computers company nor PCS Mobile company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Doggone Computers company nor PCS Mobile company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Doggone Computers company nor PCS Mobile company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PCS Mobile company nor Doggone Computers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PCS Mobile company nor Doggone Computers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PCS Mobile company employs more people globally than Doggone Computers company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PCS Mobile nor Doggone Computers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References