Comparison Overview

PcComponentes

VS

Samsung Electronics

PcComponentes

Avda Europa 2-3., Alhama de Murcia, 30840, ES
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.pccomponentes.com

Tienda online de informática y nuevas tecnologías con más de 8 años de experiencia, ofreciendo siempre el mejor precio y servicio posibles. Contamos con una amplia cartera de clientes en toda España y Portugal, con un gran equipo de profesionales y con una infraestructura capaz de servir cientos de pedidos diariamente. Todo para que nuestro máximo objetivo sea cumplido: la satisfacción plena de todos nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 651
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Samsung Electronics

129 Samsung-ro, Suwon-Si, 443-742, KR
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.samsung.com

Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medical devices, semiconductors and LED solutions. Samsung is also leading in the Internet of Things space through, among others, our Smart Home and Digital Health initiatives. Since being established in 1969, Samsung Electronics has grown into one of the world’s leading technology companies, and become recognized as one of the top 10 global brands. Our network now extends across the world, and Samsung takes great pride in the creativity and diversity of its talented people, who drive our growth. To discover more, please visit our website at www.samsung.com and our official newsroom at news.samsung.com

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 167,492
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pccomponentes.jpeg
PcComponentes
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsung-electronics.jpeg
Samsung Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PcComponentes
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Samsung Electronics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

PcComponentes has 68.45% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Electronics in 2026.

Incident History — PcComponentes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PcComponentes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Samsung Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pccomponentes.jpeg
PcComponentes
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Leaked login credentials from other breaches
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Reused login credentials from previous breaches
Motivation: Data exfiltration and sale on dark web
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsung-electronics.jpeg
Samsung Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Image Files, Closed-Source Library Exploitation (libimagecodec.quram.so)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Samsung Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PcComponentes company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Samsung Electronics company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to PcComponentes company.

In the current year, PcComponentes company has reported more cyber incidents than Samsung Electronics company.

Neither Samsung Electronics company nor PcComponentes company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Samsung Electronics company and PcComponentes company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Samsung Electronics company nor PcComponentes company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Samsung Electronics company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PcComponentes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Samsung Electronics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PcComponentes company.

Samsung Electronics company employs more people globally than PcComponentes company, reflecting its scale as a Computers and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Samsung Electronics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References