Comparison Overview

PcComponentes

VS

Apple

PcComponentes

Avda Europa 2-3., Alhama de Murcia, 30840, ES
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Tienda online de informática y nuevas tecnologías con más de 8 años de experiencia, ofreciendo siempre el mejor precio y servicio posibles. Contamos con una amplia cartera de clientes en toda España y Portugal, con un gran equipo de profesionales y con una infraestructura capaz de servir cientos de pedidos diariamente. Todo para que nuestro máximo objetivo sea cumplido: la satisfacción plena de todos nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 651
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Apple

1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, 95014, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

We’re a diverse collective of thinkers and doers, continually reimagining what’s possible to help us all do what we love in new ways. And the same innovation that goes into our products also applies to our practices — strengthening our commitment to leave the world better than we found it. This is where your work can make a difference in people’s lives. Including your own. Apple is an equal opportunity employer that is committed to inclusion and diversity. Visit apple.com/careers to learn more.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 173,021
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pccomponentes.jpeg
PcComponentes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apple.jpeg
Apple
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PcComponentes
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Apple
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

PcComponentes has 68.45% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Apple has 68.45% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — PcComponentes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PcComponentes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Apple (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pccomponentes.jpeg
PcComponentes
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Leaked login credentials from other breaches
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Reused login credentials from previous breaches
Motivation: Data exfiltration and sale on dark web
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apple.jpeg
Apple
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Infostealing Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: espionage, financial gain, disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious web content (WebKit-based)
Motivation: Espionage, targeted surveillance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Apple company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PcComponentes company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Apple company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to PcComponentes company.

In the current year, Apple and PcComponentes have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Apple company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PcComponentes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Apple company and PcComponentes company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Apple company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PcComponentes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apple company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PcComponentes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PcComponentes company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Apple company.

Apple company employs more people globally than PcComponentes company, reflecting its scale as a Computers and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PcComponentes nor Apple holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.