Comparison Overview

Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries

VS

Brantford Public Library

Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries

Cumberland Pkwy, None, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, US, 17055
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

PCBL is an organization of advocates that speak for libraries throughout Pennsylvania. Membership is open to anyone who wants to see strong, well funded libraries with the best possible library service for all of Pennsylvania's citizens. This roster includes librarians, trustees of libraries, government officials and friends of libraries, as well as the lay citizen user of libraries. Members are kept up to date on legislative information and actions as they pertain to Pennsylvania libraries; have opportunities to attend library advocacy and library fundraising workshops; and receive information about events, programs, and issues of interest to library advocates.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brantford Public Library

173 Colborne St, Brantford, Ontario, N3T 2G8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Brantford Public Library provides free access to information, ideas and opportunities for discovery. The Library offers programs and services at two branches. Plus, there are several digital services available through the Library's website. These services include eBooks and Audiobooks, language training, video tutorials through Lynda.com, access to Ancestry.com, several databases and more.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcbl.jpeg
Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brantford-public-library.jpeg
Brantford Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brantford Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brantford Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brantford Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brantford Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcbl.jpeg
Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brantford-public-library.jpeg
Brantford Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brantford Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brantford Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company.

In the current year, Brantford Public Library company and Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brantford Public Library company nor Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brantford Public Library company nor Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brantford Public Library company nor Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company nor Brantford Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company nor Brantford Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brantford Public Library company employs more people globally than Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pennsylvania Citizens for Better Libraries nor Brantford Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H