Comparison Overview

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center

VS

City of Hope

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center

3100 Oak Grove Rd, Poplar Bluff, 63902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center (PBRMC) is located in the heart of Southeast Missouri in Poplar Bluff and serves Butler County and seven other surrounding counties. PBRMC is committed to meeting our community’s healthcare needs by providing compassionate, quality patient care. The medical center offers a wide range of services, including oncology, cardiology, orthopedics, robotic surgery, women’s health and more. Learn more at PBRMC.com

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 498
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

City of Hope

1500 E. Duarte Road, None, Duarte, CA, US, 91010
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

City of Hope's mission is to deliver the cures of tomorrow to the people who need them today. Founded in 1913, City of Hope has grown into one of the largest cancer research and treatment organizations in the U.S. and one of the leading research centers for diabetes and other life-threatening illnesses. City of Hope research has been the basis for numerous breakthrough cancer medicines, as well as human synthetic insulin and monoclonal antibodies. With an independent, National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center at its core, City of Hope brings a uniquely integrated model to patients spanning cancer care, research and development, academics and training, and innovation initiatives. City of Hope’s growing national system includes its Los Angeles campus, a network of clinical care locations across Southern California, a new cancer center in Orange County, California, and treatment facilities in Atlanta, Chicago and Phoenix. City of Hope’s affiliated group of organizations includes Translational Genomics Research Institute and AccessHope™.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,858
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pbrmc.jpeg
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hope.jpeg
City of Hope
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Hope
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Hope in 2025.

Incident History — Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Hope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Hope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pbrmc.jpeg
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Damage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-hope.jpeg
City of Hope
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Hope company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Hope company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company.

In the current year, City of Hope company and Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Hope company nor Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

City of Hope company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

City of Hope company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company nor City of Hope company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Hope company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company.

City of Hope company employs more people globally than Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center nor City of Hope holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L