Comparison Overview

PB Consulting

VS

EY-Parthenon

PB Consulting

Beatrixstraat 14 Nijkerk, Gelderland 3862, NL
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.pbconsulting.nl

Excellent

Organisatie voor advies en ad interim management. PB Consulting staat voor Partnership en Betrouwbaarheid, waarbij continuïteit van uw core business uitgangspunt is. Kernbegrippen hierbij zijn kwaliteit en integriteit. Zaken als "kwaliteit boven kwantiteit" en "afspraak is afspraak" staan hoog in het vaandel. PB Consulting: tijdelijke inzet, definitief resultaat!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1 employee
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EY-Parthenon

1 More London Place, None, London, United Kingdom, GB, SE1 2AF
Last Update: 2025-07-27 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.ey.com/parthenon

Our unique combination of transformative strategy, transactions and corporate finance delivers real-world value – solutions that work in practice, not just on paper. Benefiting from EY’s full spectrum of services, we’ve reimagined strategic consulting to work in a world of increasing complexity. With deep functional and sector expertise, paired with innovative AI-powered technology and an investor mindset, we partner with CEOs, boards, private equity and governments every step of the way – enabling you to shape your future with confidence. EY-Parthenon is a brand under which a number of EY member firms across the globe provide strategy consulting services. For more information, please visit ey.com/parthenon.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 15,458
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pb-consulting.jpeg
PB Consulting
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ey-parthenon.jpeg
EY-Parthenon
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
PB Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EY-Parthenon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PB Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EY-Parthenon in 2025.

Incident History — PB Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PB Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EY-Parthenon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EY-Parthenon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pb-consulting.jpeg
PB Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ey-parthenon.jpeg
EY-Parthenon
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party service vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

PB Consulting company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to EY-Parthenon company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

EY-Parthenon company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PB Consulting company has not reported any.

In the current year, EY-Parthenon company and PB Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EY-Parthenon company nor PB Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EY-Parthenon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while PB Consulting company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EY-Parthenon company nor PB Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PB Consulting company nor EY-Parthenon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

EY-Parthenon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PB Consulting company.

EY-Parthenon company employs more people globally than PB Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
References
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References