Comparison Overview

PB Consulting

VS

Ayesa

PB Consulting

Beatrixstraat 14 Nijkerk, Gelderland 3862, NL
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.pbconsulting.nl

Excellent

Organisatie voor advies en ad interim management. PB Consulting staat voor Partnership en Betrouwbaarheid, waarbij continuïteit van uw core business uitgangspunt is. Kernbegrippen hierbij zijn kwaliteit en integriteit. Zaken als "kwaliteit boven kwantiteit" en "afspraak is afspraak" staan hoog in het vaandel. PB Consulting: tijdelijke inzet, definitief resultaat!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1 employee
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ayesa

Parque Científico Tecnológico Cartuja, Sevilla, Andalucía 41092, ES Sevilla, Sevilla, ES
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Good

Between 700 and 800
http://www.ayesa.com

Ayesa is a global provider of technology and engineering services with more than 11500 employees in twenty-three countries across Europe, Latin America, Africa and Asia. The company develops and implements digital solutions for the private and public sector and uses the latest technology to provide cutting-edge infrastructure design and supervision services. To do this, it has certified experts covering more than 70 different disciplines in utilities and energy; the public sector; banking and insurance; water and the environment, transportation; aeronautics and defence; and construction. As a company that is driven by people and innovation, its business approach is underpinned by talent.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pb-consulting.jpeg
PB Consulting
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ayesa.jpeg
Ayesa
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
PB Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ayesa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PB Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ayesa in 2025.

Incident History — PB Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PB Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ayesa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ayesa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pb-consulting.jpeg
PB Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ayesa.jpeg
Ayesa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PB Consulting company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Ayesa company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ayesa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PB Consulting company.

In the current year, Ayesa company and PB Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ayesa company nor PB Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ayesa company nor PB Consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ayesa company nor PB Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PB Consulting company nor Ayesa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PB Consulting company nor Ayesa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither PB Consulting company nor Ayesa company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
References
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References