Comparison Overview

Payne Publishers, Inc.

VS

Benjamin Litho, Inc.

Payne Publishers, Inc.

8707 Quarry Road, Manassas, VA, 20110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Payne Publishers, Inc. is a manufacturer of calendars, planners, journals, datebooks, and organizers for wholesale, retail, and college bookstore markets. We offer a wide variety of styles and formats for both the academic year starting in August and the calendar year beginning in January. Many products are customized or embellished for schools and corporations throughout the country. Payne Publishers, Inc. is also active in the Promotional Products market, and is an Approved Supplier for the Real Estate Advertising Industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Benjamin Litho, Inc.

1810 Oakland Road, San Jose, California, 95131, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Since 1986 BLI has satisfied the rigorous demands of corporations and organizations best marketing departments. We provide high quality offset printing, digital printing, promotional products, corporate apparel, large format printing and on-line solutions. At BLI our dedication to delivering the highest level of service and quality is what separates us from our competition. We will deliver superior quality and service at a price that maximizes your marketing budget. Here at BLI we are problem solvers, creative engineers, strategic thinkers, listeners and innovators. We are passionate about what we do. We have structured our company to be a cost-effective tool for any marketing communications department. BLI’s slogan “For All Things Printed” means working with only one company for all your marketing needs. This helps to maximize your efforts and allows you to complete successful projects on time and under budget. BLI is proud to help you accomplish all of your marketing goals! Contact us anytime at 408-232-3800 or email us at [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/payne-publishers-inc-.jpeg
Payne Publishers, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benjamin-litho.jpeg
Benjamin Litho, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Payne Publishers, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benjamin Litho, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Payne Publishers, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Benjamin Litho, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Payne Publishers, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Payne Publishers, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Benjamin Litho, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Benjamin Litho, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/payne-publishers-inc-.jpeg
Payne Publishers, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benjamin-litho.jpeg
Benjamin Litho, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Payne Publishers, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Benjamin Litho, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Benjamin Litho, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Payne Publishers, Inc. company.

In the current year, Benjamin Litho, Inc. company and Payne Publishers, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Benjamin Litho, Inc. company nor Payne Publishers, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Benjamin Litho, Inc. company nor Payne Publishers, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Benjamin Litho, Inc. company nor Payne Publishers, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. company nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. company nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Payne Publishers, Inc. company employs more people globally than Benjamin Litho, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Payne Publishers, Inc. nor Benjamin Litho, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N