Comparison Overview

Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ

VS

Senior.com

Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ

undefined, Southern California, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Pets are our passion! Here at Pawstruck.com we provide a premier e-commerce website with the best in bully sticks, dog treats, dog bones, and more. We are a company of likeminded individuals with one goalโ€”providing our fellow dog lovers a website with high quality, safe and reasonably priced dog products. Above all else, we strive to keep your dog happy and healthy while supplying a fun and intuitive shopping experience.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Senior.com

15791 Rockfield Blvd, Irvine, California, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

Senior.com is the #1 Online resource for Seniors & Caregivers because of 1 thing.......WE CARE! One of our specialties is helping people stay in their homes longer. With the right equipment installed in a home, we can prevent falls. Fall prevention is the #1 way to make sure you donโ€™t slide into a new stage of care that might require assisted living, costing 10's of thousands of dollars. Our Customer Care Specialists can educate you about improving different hot spots in your home so you can maintain your independence for as long as possible. Today, Senior.com has 2.7 million members and we are rapidly growing every day. We offer over 500 top brands and sell over 150,000 products throughout the United States. We have earned our reputation by providing quality content, personalized customer service and being a trusted supplier.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 382
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pawstruck-com.jpeg
Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ
โ€”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior.com.jpeg
Senior.com
โ€”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Senior.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senior.com in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Senior.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senior.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pawstruck-com.jpeg
Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior.com.jpeg
Senior.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Senior.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Senior.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company.

In the current year, Senior.com company and Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Senior.com company nor Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Senior.com company nor Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Senior.com company nor Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company nor Senior.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Senior.com company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company.

Senior.com company employs more people globally than Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pawstruck ๐Ÿถ nor Senior.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimitย option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimitย for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimitย option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable codeย (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working codeย (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf)ย without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimitย before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5ย (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100ย (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=valueย (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse()ย with user-controlled input and arrayLimitย for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=xย (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted โ†’ application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L