Comparison Overview

Paw Print & Mail

VS

Komori America Corporation

Paw Print & Mail

12 Gregory Drive, South Burlington, Vermont, 05403, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.paw-prints.com

Serving Greater Burlington and Vermont businesses and organizations since 1990, the Paw Print & Mail Team has earned the trust and confidence of clients with attentive service that’s prompt, courteous, and knowledgeable. Though we work with clients across many industries, we specialize in direct mail fundraising appeals for our many nonprofit and charitable organization clients. We bring a level of partnering to these relationships through the experiences we've witnessed and been a part of for over 30 years. In addition to printing and mailing, we provide a range of marketing services including graphic design, branded promotional products, large format signage, campaign development, and copywriting. Looking for a better printing, mailing, or marketing experience? Contact us to start the conversation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Komori America Corporation

5520 Meadowbrook Industrial Ct., Rolling Meadows, IL, 60008, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.komori-america.us/

As a global company that contributes culturally, socially and economically, Komori continues to answer the demand for printers looking for new ways to grow and profit and develop a successful path to becoming a print media enterprise. Operating our company under the banner of kando—beyond expectations—Komori strives to expand its customers’ potential with innovative ways to provide print output solutions, materials and equipment that will open new pages in business scenarios of every kind. Our goal: To continue our pursuit of broadening the potential of print for a future that is rich in printed communications.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paw-print-mail.jpeg
Paw Print & Mail
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/komori-america-corporation.jpeg
Komori America Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Paw Print & Mail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Komori America Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paw Print & Mail in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Komori America Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Paw Print & Mail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paw Print & Mail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Komori America Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Komori America Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paw-print-mail.jpeg
Paw Print & Mail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/komori-america-corporation.jpeg
Komori America Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Komori America Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Paw Print & Mail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Komori America Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Paw Print & Mail company.

In the current year, Komori America Corporation company and Paw Print & Mail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Komori America Corporation company nor Paw Print & Mail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Komori America Corporation company nor Paw Print & Mail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Komori America Corporation company nor Paw Print & Mail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Paw Print & Mail company nor Komori America Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Paw Print & Mail company nor Komori America Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Komori America Corporation company employs more people globally than Paw Print & Mail company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Paw Print & Mail nor Komori America Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References