Comparison Overview

PAV

VS

Aspen Historical Society

PAV

US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.parcoartevivente.it

A museum of contemporary art especially dedicated to the living art, exploring the relation between at and nature, art and science, in a truely ecological sense. PAV is a little, eco-sustainable museum with exposition rooms and a laboratory, encircled by green park enriched by permanent and temporary artworks (from landart to landscaping). The PAV art program and the educational work are closely related, involving artistic research, collective activities, publishing, and so on.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Aspen Historical Society

620 W. Bleeker St., Aspen, CO 81611, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aspenhistory.org

Aspen Historical Society (AHS) actively preserves and passionately presents local history in an inspired and provocative manner that will continue to anchor the local community and its evolving character. AHS maintains one of the largest public archives in the region, with a portion of its collection available online as a free resource. AHS operates four historical sites: the Wheeler/Stallard Museum, the Holden/Marolt Mining & Ranching Museum, and the ghost towns of Independence and Ashcroft. AHS provides free history education for local schools, including field programs at the historical sites and in-classroom lessons. Locals and visitors of all ages are invited to explore the history of the upper Roaring Fork Valley with guided tours, programs, and community events offered year-round. Tours (both walking and in the AHS electric vehicle) include the historical downtown core and Aspen’s Victorian West End neighborhood, historical buildings the Hotel Jerome and Wheeler Opera House, and storied sites around the area such as Red Butte Cemetery, rail corridors, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PAV
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-historical-society.jpeg
Aspen Historical Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PAV
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspen Historical Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PAV in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Historical Society in 2026.

Incident History — PAV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PAV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspen Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PAV
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspen-historical-society.jpeg
Aspen Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PAV company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspen Historical Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aspen Historical Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PAV company.

In the current year, Aspen Historical Society company and PAV company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspen Historical Society company nor PAV company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspen Historical Society company nor PAV company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aspen Historical Society company nor PAV company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PAV company nor Aspen Historical Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PAV company nor Aspen Historical Society company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PAV company employs more people globally than Aspen Historical Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PAV nor Aspen Historical Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References