Comparison Overview

Paul Baker Printing

VS

Joseph Berning Printing

Paul Baker Printing

220 Riverside Ave, Roseville, California, 95678, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Paul Baker Printing is a family-owned business with hundreds of happy clients serving as a true testament to our commitment to printing excellence. Over the years, we’ve developed an ideal formula for successful graphic communications projects: equal parts careful planning, experienced technical skills, sophisticated equipment and excellent craftsmanship – with a large dose of dependability and personal attention to your creative vision. We’re committed to working as a hands-on team to ensure that your projects are delivered on time and on budget. Preserving our environment is a top priority at Paul Baker Printing. We have instituted numerous changes throughout our plant to reduce energy consumption, recycle waste materials, and use/re-use earth-friendly resources whenever possible: • All of our inks are soy based • FSC Certified • Any residual ink or solvent is regenerated to create new energy, not buried • We recycle 25 tons of paper to be reused each month • Our lifts are powered by natural gas • We use energy efficient bulbs throughout our shop • We encourage all of our clients to choose a recycled or partially recycled stock

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Joseph Berning Printing

1850 Dalton Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45214, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Family-owned since 1883 now in the fifth generation! Mid-sized commercial print shop with the personable feel and customer care of a small company but the printing quality, capabilities, and timeliness of a large company. State-of-the-art technology, innovative materials, and impeccable finishing services result in the finest quality print work available. Capabilities include: ELECTRONIC PRE-PRESS: PC and Mac Capabilities Typesetting Computer-to-Plate Photo Retouching Imposition Digital Color Correction Color Proofing PRINTING: Sheetfed Lithography Varnishes Special Coatings & Laser Inks Aqueous Coatings Posters Brochures Annual Reports Direct Mail Special Promotions Point of Purchase Book Jackets Catalogs Inserts Letterhead, Envelopes, and Business Cards FINISHING SERVICES: Complete Bindery Laminating Trimming Punching Combination Folding Collating Saddle Stitching Wire-O Binding GBC Binding Spiral Binding Embossing Stamping Drilling Die-Cutting Padding Numbering Shrink Wrapping FULFILLMENT: Hand Work Storage Delivery

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paul-baker-printing.jpeg
Paul Baker Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-berning-printing.jpeg
Joseph Berning Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Paul Baker Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joseph Berning Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paul Baker Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joseph Berning Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Paul Baker Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paul Baker Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joseph Berning Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joseph Berning Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paul-baker-printing.jpeg
Paul Baker Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-berning-printing.jpeg
Joseph Berning Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Paul Baker Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joseph Berning Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joseph Berning Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Paul Baker Printing company.

In the current year, Joseph Berning Printing company and Paul Baker Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing company nor Paul Baker Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing company nor Paul Baker Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joseph Berning Printing company nor Paul Baker Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Paul Baker Printing company nor Joseph Berning Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Paul Baker Printing company nor Joseph Berning Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paul Baker Printing company employs more people globally than Joseph Berning Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Paul Baker Printing nor Joseph Berning Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N