Comparison Overview

Patriot Gaming & Electronics

VS

Star Sports

Patriot Gaming & Electronics

217 N. Lindberg St., Griffith, Indiana, 46319, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Patriot Gaming & Electronics, Inc. is focused on providing the gaming industry with a wide variety of products, alternatives, low cost solutions, and unprecedented service. We have provided gaming equipment and electronics supplies to casinos and customers across the globe. Our Las Vegas, Midwest, and Atlantic City area offices serve all major North American gaming markets. We also have dedicated service to the Caribbean, Central and South America. Our expanded inventory has over 15,000 different new and used gaming parts to choose from, including OEM parts for WMS, IGT, Aristocrat, Konami, Aruze, Bally, and more. We have everything you need, when you need it.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Star Sports

The Knoll Business Estate, Hove, undefined, BN3 7GS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded and owned by Ben Keith, Star Sports are the UK’s leading luxury bookmaker, originally launched as Star Racing in 1999. Star Sports now offer a fully interactive betting experience for desktop, mobile and tablet at www.starsports.bet, telephone betting, a prestigious betting shop in London’s Mayfair and have prominent racecourse betting pitches, including at the headline events of the year: the Cheltenham Festival, Epsom's Derby meeting, Royal Ascot and Glorious Goodwood. Star Sports are also the current sponsors of the English Greyhound Derby, as well as being regular sponsors of UK horse racing events. Star Sports provide a content and news site at www.starsportsbet.co.uk with daily offers, video interviews and blogs from their brand ambassadors. To contact Star Sports please email: [email protected]

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 251
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patriot-gaming-&-electronics.jpeg
Patriot Gaming & Electronics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/star-sports.jpeg
Star Sports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patriot Gaming & Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Star Sports
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patriot Gaming & Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Star Sports in 2025.

Incident History — Patriot Gaming & Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patriot Gaming & Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Star Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Star Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patriot-gaming-&-electronics.jpeg
Patriot Gaming & Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/star-sports.jpeg
Star Sports
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Star Sports company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patriot Gaming & Electronics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Star Sports company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patriot Gaming & Electronics company.

In the current year, Star Sports company and Patriot Gaming & Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Star Sports company nor Patriot Gaming & Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Star Sports company nor Patriot Gaming & Electronics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Star Sports company nor Patriot Gaming & Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics company nor Star Sports company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics company nor Star Sports company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Star Sports company employs more people globally than Patriot Gaming & Electronics company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patriot Gaming & Electronics nor Star Sports holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H