Comparison Overview

Patrick Mechanical Ltd.

VS

Leinolat Group

Patrick Mechanical Ltd.

119 Magill St, Lively, Ontario, P3Y 1K6, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a Sudbury based mechanical contracting company founded in 1989. Over the years, we established ourselves in the industrial, commercial and institutional contracting fields. Our specialties include mechanical contracting, custom steel fabrication, plumbing, heating, process piping, millwright and related services. Our completely equipped fabrication shop and fully qualified employees are committed to offering the highest quality of workmanship available.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Leinolat Group

Tapionkatu 7, Vaasa, FI
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Leinolat Group is a group of five companies who provide customers with comprehensive service solutions in the metalworking sector. KILKANEN, experts in precision machining LEIMEC, supplier of demanding ventilation solutions and the BOBI mail and parcel boxes. UWIRA, manufacturer of piping products and pressure vessels. T-DRILL, manufacturer of pipe fabrication machines and solutions. BOBI.COM, designer and manufacturer of the BOBI mail and parcel boxes.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick-mechanical-limited.jpeg
Patrick Mechanical Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leinolat-group.jpeg
Leinolat Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patrick Mechanical Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Leinolat Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patrick Mechanical Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leinolat Group in 2025.

Incident History — Patrick Mechanical Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patrick Mechanical Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Leinolat Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leinolat Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick-mechanical-limited.jpeg
Patrick Mechanical Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leinolat-group.jpeg
Leinolat Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Leinolat Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Leinolat Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company.

In the current year, Leinolat Group company and Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Leinolat Group company nor Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Leinolat Group company nor Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Leinolat Group company nor Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company nor Leinolat Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company nor Leinolat Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Patrick Mechanical Ltd. company employs more people globally than Leinolat Group company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patrick Mechanical Ltd. nor Leinolat Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H