Comparison Overview

Patrick's Signs

VS

Henry & Co.

Patrick's Signs

5115 S. Arville St., Las Vegas, NV, 89118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Patrick's Signs is a leader in the Sign and Large Format Printing Industry. Patrick's Signs has been in the Sign Business since 1993 in the Las Vegas area. Patrick's Signs is a Full Service Sign & Print Shop specializing in Custom Signs, Illuminated Building Signage, Pylon & Monument Signs, Channel Letters & Custom Illuminated Cabinet Signs, Non-Illuminated Signs, Vehicle Wraps & Graphics, Fleet Vehicle Graphics, Racing Graphics & Wraps, Specialty Wraps, Wall Wraps, Banners and Large Format Printing. We are also a Lighting Maintenance and Sign Service Company and a respected National Ship-In Sign Company. Nothing is too large or too small for the experienced team at Patrick's Signs. For free quotes please call (702)873-4463. You can also email us directly at: [email protected]. Visit our website for more info: www.patrickssigns.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Henry & Co.

undefined, undefined, undefined, 30341, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Henry & Co. delivers only the finest of high-end specialty product. Whether it is a wooden box hand crafted and lined, customized to you or your clients specific needs or a stationary package unlike any other, Henry & Co. is the place inspiration happens. We cater to the art and design community as well as the legal and engineering fields. High design becomes reality within our walls. If everyone says, it can't be done, this is where it can. Our services include, but are not limited to, Letterpress, diecutting, foil stamping, emboss/deboss.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick's-signs.jpeg
Patrick's Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/henry-&-co..jpeg
Henry & Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patrick's Signs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Henry & Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patrick's Signs in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Henry & Co. in 2025.

Incident History — Patrick's Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patrick's Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Henry & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Henry & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick's-signs.jpeg
Patrick's Signs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/henry-&-co..jpeg
Henry & Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Patrick's Signs company and Henry & Co. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Henry & Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patrick's Signs company.

In the current year, Henry & Co. company and Patrick's Signs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Henry & Co. company nor Patrick's Signs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Henry & Co. company nor Patrick's Signs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Henry & Co. company nor Patrick's Signs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patrick's Signs company nor Henry & Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patrick's Signs company nor Henry & Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Patrick's Signs company employs more people globally than Henry & Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Henry & Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L