Comparison Overview

Patrick's Signs

VS

Camelot Copy Center

Patrick's Signs

5115 S. Arville St., Las Vegas, NV, 89118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.patrickssigns.com

Patrick's Signs is a leader in the Sign and Large Format Printing Industry. Patrick's Signs has been in the Sign Business since 1993 in the Las Vegas area. Patrick's Signs is a Full Service Sign & Print Shop specializing in Custom Signs, Illuminated Building Signage, Pylon & Monument Signs, Channel Letters & Custom Illuminated Cabinet Signs, Non-Illuminated Signs, Vehicle Wraps & Graphics, Fleet Vehicle Graphics, Racing Graphics & Wraps, Specialty Wraps, Wall Wraps, Banners and Large Format Printing. We are also a Lighting Maintenance and Sign Service Company and a respected National Ship-In Sign Company. Nothing is too large or too small for the experienced team at Patrick's Signs. For free quotes please call (702)873-4463. You can also email us directly at: [email protected]. Visit our website for more info: www.patrickssigns.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Camelot Copy Center

100 Fuller Road, Albany, NY, 12205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.teamcamelot.com

Camelot specializes in practically any type of printing/copying your company might need. We realize that each job is customized to your business so our attention to detail is paramount. But even a perfect job isn't worth much if its not done on time, when you need it. Our customer service staff will make you think you are their only customer by offering quick price quotes, free pick-up and delivery and hardcopy or online proofs. With a production floor that operates 24/7, we go the extra mile to ensure your satisfaction. And if that's not enough...how about a free bag of freshly baked cookies with every order? Its our way of saying thank you for your business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick's-signs.jpeg
Patrick's Signs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camelot-copy-center.jpeg
Camelot Copy Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patrick's Signs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Camelot Copy Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patrick's Signs in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camelot Copy Center in 2025.

Incident History — Patrick's Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patrick's Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Camelot Copy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camelot Copy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick's-signs.jpeg
Patrick's Signs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camelot-copy-center.jpeg
Camelot Copy Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Camelot Copy Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patrick's Signs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Camelot Copy Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patrick's Signs company.

In the current year, Camelot Copy Center company and Patrick's Signs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Camelot Copy Center company nor Patrick's Signs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Camelot Copy Center company nor Patrick's Signs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Camelot Copy Center company nor Patrick's Signs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patrick's Signs company nor Camelot Copy Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patrick's Signs company nor Camelot Copy Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Patrick's Signs company employs more people globally than Camelot Copy Center company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patrick's Signs nor Camelot Copy Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References