Comparison Overview

Patricia McMahon Photography Agency

VS

Falcon Film Studios

Patricia McMahon Photography Agency

De Beauvoir Block, London, undefined, N14EN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

PATRICIA MCMAHON REPRESENTS IS AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY BASED IN LONDON THAT REPRESENTS PHOTOGRAPHERS, DIRECTORS AND SET DESIGNERS. WE HAVE OVER 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE WORKING TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS WITHIN ARTIST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION, DEVELOPING LONG LASTING RELATIONSHIPS WITH LEADING LUXURY BRANDS AS WELL AS GLOBAL ADVERTISING AND CREATIVE AGENCIES. PATRICIA MCMAHON IS COMMITTED TO PROMOTING AND NURTURING EMERGING TALENTS FROM ALL BACKGROUNDS, AND SUPPORTING ARTISTS THROUGHOUT EDITORIAL, COMMERCIAL AND PERSONAL PROJECTS. WE OFFER IN-HOUSE PRODUCTION SERVICES AND HAVE EXPERIENCE PRODUCING GLOBALLY WITHIN EDITORIAL, COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING, AND FILM.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Falcon Film Studios

340 N Main St , Plymouth, Michigan, 48170, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Falcon Film Studios is a wedding services company. We strives daily to dream up ideas and continually make wedding photos and videos unique. It's important to us that the memories we capture can be cherished by brides for a lifetime. We couldn't thank our clients more for voting us "Best Wedding Photographer's"​ in Detroit via Hour Magazine. We are honored to be considered by our town as the best! As we grow, so does our reputation. Meet with us, see what all the buzz is about! Also, check out our segment on WXYZ's ultimate planning show in the videos tab. Give our service a try with a FREE ENGAGEMENT PHOTO SESSION. No strings attached. We are currently running some amazing specials, call us today! We have awesome gifts for referring bridal friends. The gift can be yours or theirs! Phone: 734-365-4283 Web: www.falconfilmstudios.com

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patricia-mcmahon.jpeg
Patricia McMahon Photography Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falconfilmstudios.jpeg
Falcon Film Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patricia McMahon Photography Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Falcon Film Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patricia McMahon Photography Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Falcon Film Studios in 2025.

Incident History — Patricia McMahon Photography Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patricia McMahon Photography Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Falcon Film Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Falcon Film Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patricia-mcmahon.jpeg
Patricia McMahon Photography Agency
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falconfilmstudios.jpeg
Falcon Film Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Falcon Film Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Falcon Film Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company.

In the current year, Falcon Film Studios company and Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Falcon Film Studios company nor Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Falcon Film Studios company nor Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Falcon Film Studios company nor Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company nor Falcon Film Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company nor Falcon Film Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Falcon Film Studios company employs more people globally than Patricia McMahon Photography Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patricia McMahon Photography Agency nor Falcon Film Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N