Comparison Overview

Pathways Transition Programs, Inc.

VS

Eden Counseling Services

Pathways Transition Programs, Inc.

120 E Trinity Pl, Decatur, Georgia, 30030, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Pathways Transition Programs is a private mental health center headquartered in Downtown Decatur, Georgia. Since 1991, we've been committed to providing innovative, accountable, and responsive services to a diverse client population including — • Low income single parent families • Families caught in multi-generational cycles of instability, abuse and neglect • Children in foster care children with developmental and behavioral challenges • Women who are victims of domestic violence and unprepared for self advocacy and self-sufficiency • Families involved with child protective services and juvenile justice systems • LGBT individuals, couples, and families Our mission is to assist adults and children, their parents and caregivers, prevail over life's most difficult challenges. We recognize all adults, kids and families are distinctive and everyone adapts to their unique circumstances as best they can. We offer parents and caregivers a broader, more empathic understanding of children's emotional needs, tools for meeting these needs, and skills for managing problematic behaviors. Our goal is to help all our clients heal wounds with awareness, nurture skills to promote self-regulation, self-worth and connection with family, peers, and community, so adults create joy in their lives and children can grow into compassionate, confident, and happy adults.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eden Counseling Services

20253 Redwood Road, Castro Valley, California, 94546, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

At Eden, we are committed to a culture of inclusion that reflects our real world and the diverse communities that we serve. We value people and ideas that are AUTHENTIC and UNIQUE, striving to create a space that is SAFE for every person to be their true self. Whether by difference in age, race, gender, identity, religion, sexual orientation, financial status, or physical or mental ability, we honor the unique combination of life experiences that our team members bring to this work. Eden Counseling is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization located in Castro Valley serving the community since 2000. Eden’s Vision is one of Safety & Wellness for the community as a whole – Supporting the diverse needs of our clients and the community at large, as well as our staff members. Our programs include an innovative 48-hour Crisis Receiving Home (CRH) for youth (8-17 yrs.); School-Based counseling services at the Castro Valley Middle and High Schools; Clinic-Based Outpatient services for the local community; Case Management, and Crisis Support/ Reunification services for youth brought to our CRH. Therapy Services include individual, dyadic, family, couples, and group therapy. Eden strives to provide the highest quality Client-Centered, Family-Oriented, Culturally and Contextually responsive, Trauma-Informed care, grounded in Attachment based theories. Our clients are primarily local adults, youth and families from the Eden area (unincorporated Alameda County). Eden clients represent the diversity that exists in our community. A breakdown of clients Eden has recently supported includes: 36% Latinx; 17% African-American; 6% Asian-American; 25% Euro-American; 2% Native-American; and 14% other. We continue to focus on increasing services we specifically offer the LGBTQ+ community. Languages offered by current staff members includes Spanish, Tagalog, Japanese, French, and English. Eden provides services on a sliding-scale fee, as well as under contract within the Delinquency Prevention

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-transition-programs.jpeg
Pathways Transition Programs, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eden-counseling-service.jpeg
Eden Counseling Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pathways Transition Programs, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eden Counseling Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eden Counseling Services in 2026.

Incident History — Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eden Counseling Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eden Counseling Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-transition-programs.jpeg
Pathways Transition Programs, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eden-counseling-service.jpeg
Eden Counseling Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company and Eden Counseling Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Eden Counseling Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company.

In the current year, Eden Counseling Services company and Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eden Counseling Services company nor Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eden Counseling Services company nor Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eden Counseling Services company nor Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company nor Eden Counseling Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company nor Eden Counseling Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. company employs more people globally than Eden Counseling Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pathways Transition Programs, Inc. nor Eden Counseling Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N