Comparison Overview

Pathways to Housing DC

VS

Indigo Brabant

Pathways to Housing DC

1151 Bladensburg Rd NE, Washington, 20002, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Founded in 2004, Pathways to Housing DC provides home, health, and hope to more than 3,500 adults each year who are experiencing homelessness or at risk for homelessness. Pathways to Housing DC initially opened our doors to end homelessness and help the healing of men and women who were considered “chronically homeless”- those individuals living on the streets for years with serious mental health challenges such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder that were not being treated. What made Pathways to Housing DC unique in a city with many mental health and housing programs was our Housing First model. Other agencies operated with rules and pre-housing requirements such as curfews, mandated sobriety, compliance with medication, and participation in groups either before entering housing, or as a requirement to keep housing. This approach worked for the majority of homeless individuals seeking services, but the remaining most psychiatrically disabled and vulnerable subgroup stayed on the street and was not effectively housed within the existing system of care. What has made Pathways to Housing DC so unique in its success over the past decade is our reversal of this traditional treatment sequence. Instead of requiring people to be “clean and sober” or “housing ready,” Pathways DC offers housing, first. Since placing its first client into permanent housing nearly a decade ago, Pathways to Housing DC has successfully ended chronic homelessness and supported recovery for more than 600 Washington residents. With a staff today of over 100 highly skilled professionals, Pathways to Housing DC provides comprehensive, integrated health and social services to nearly 2,000 clients annually throughout the District.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Indigo Brabant

Lage Witsiebaan 2b, Tilburg, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849

Indigo Brabant biedt hulp bij psychische problemen. Dit doet Indigo d.m.v. behandeling, preventie en praktijkondersteuning bij huisartsen. Indigo gelooft dat de samenwerking tussen de behandelaar en de cliënt erg belangrijk is: We kijken naar de behoefte én sterke kanten van de cliënt. Deze vormen in combinatie met onze effectief bewezen behandeltechnieken de basis voor een spoedig en goed herstel. U kunt zonder wachttijd bij Indigo terecht, bij u in de buurt. Waar? Indigo heeft verschillende vestigingen in Brabant: Almkerk, Breda, Cuijk, Drunen, Etten-Leur, Helmond, Oss, Rijen, Tilburg, Uden, Waalwijk en Wijk en Aalburg. Behandelingen en cursussen worden zo dicht mogelijk bij de woonplaats van de deelnemer gegeven. Prakijkondersteuner GGZ Krijgt u behandeling van uw huisarts of zijn/haar praktijkondersteuner geestelijke gezondheidszorg (POH-GGZ)?. Goede kans dat dit een medewerker is van Indigo Brabant. Indigo heeft verschillende praktijkondersteuners in Brabant.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-to-housing-dc.jpeg
Pathways to Housing DC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigo-brabant.jpeg
Indigo Brabant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pathways to Housing DC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indigo Brabant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pathways to Housing DC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indigo Brabant in 2026.

Incident History — Pathways to Housing DC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pathways to Housing DC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indigo Brabant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indigo Brabant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-to-housing-dc.jpeg
Pathways to Housing DC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigo-brabant.jpeg
Indigo Brabant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indigo Brabant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pathways to Housing DC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Indigo Brabant company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pathways to Housing DC company.

In the current year, Indigo Brabant company and Pathways to Housing DC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indigo Brabant company nor Pathways to Housing DC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indigo Brabant company nor Pathways to Housing DC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indigo Brabant company nor Pathways to Housing DC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC company nor Indigo Brabant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC company nor Indigo Brabant company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pathways to Housing DC company employs more people globally than Indigo Brabant company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pathways to Housing DC nor Indigo Brabant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N