Comparison Overview

Pathways Behavioral Services Inc.

VS

Instituto Familiar de la Raza

Pathways Behavioral Services Inc.

3362 University Avenue, Waterloo, Iowa, 50701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Pathways Behavioral Services provides prevention services; substance abuse treatment; OWI services; SAP evaluation services; gambling treatment, prevention and recovery support; and mental health services to families, individuals and communities in northeast Iowa. Pathways is a nonprofit corporation licensed by the Iowa Department of Public Health and accredited by the Department of Human Services. Founded in 1967 to serve clients in Black Hawk County, Pathways now offers substance abuse and mental health prevention and treatment services to people in Black Hawk, Bremer, Buchanan, Butler, Chickasaw and Grundy Counties. Pathways substance abuse treatment staff provide high quality, research-based and outcome-driven programs. Treatment programs are customized to work with a wide range of clients and their family members. Certified Pathways staff members handle referrals from the Department of Juvenile Court Services, schools, employers, Department of Human Services and other agencies. Pathways offers community-based services and primary prevention to equip individuals with strategies and recovery tools to prevent problems with alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. Pathways views secondary prevention as a tool for early identification of high-risk behaviors, so we provide a mixture of primary and secondary prevention services. Our mental health center clinical staff includes: - Psychiatrists - Nurse practitioners - Clinical social workers - Mental health counselors Our mental health counselors provide a wide range of mental health services, including individual, family and marital counseling; school-based programming; medication management; and 24-hour emergency service.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Instituto Familiar de la Raza

2919 Mission Street, San Francisco, California, US, 94030
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Instituto Familiar de la Raza remains true to the same principles on which it was founded. The circumstances and specific challenges facing the Chicano/Latino community continue to change, but our unique approach to its health and well-being of our community remains intact. Through a continuum of six responsive and robust programs for children, youth, adults, and families, IFR serves over 3,500 people a year. Employing traditional, contemporary and conventional modalities, IFR’s programs have received national recognition for our unique cultural interventions. With a competent bilingual staff that includes mental health professionals, paraprofessionals, and community health workers, IFR regularly employs this key tenet: la cultura cura/culture heals. IFR began as a small outpatient mental health clinic, and the need for La Clínica remains as urgent as it was when the organization was founded. IFR continued to grow as we recognized our ability to positively impact the Chicano/Latino community. True to our holistic view of health and wellness and in response to emerging community needs, Instituto began developing programs for children, youth, teachers and administrators, people with HIV/AIDS, and the indigenous/Maya population. For over 35 years, IFR has established a leadership role in community violence prevention, school-based mental health consultations, family programming, culturally-based integrated HIV services, and indigenous/Maya wellness programs. Viewed a whole, our programs are designed to provide a seamless continuum of health and wellness programs for Chicanos/Latinos in San Francisco. We remain committed to this mission.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-behavioral-services-inc-.jpeg
Pathways Behavioral Services Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instituto-familiar-de-la-raza.jpeg
Instituto Familiar de la Raza
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pathways Behavioral Services Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Instituto Familiar de la Raza
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instituto Familiar de la Raza in 2026.

Incident History — Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Instituto Familiar de la Raza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instituto Familiar de la Raza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pathways-behavioral-services-inc-.jpeg
Pathways Behavioral Services Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instituto-familiar-de-la-raza.jpeg
Instituto Familiar de la Raza
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Instituto Familiar de la Raza company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Instituto Familiar de la Raza company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company.

In the current year, Instituto Familiar de la Raza company and Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Instituto Familiar de la Raza company nor Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Instituto Familiar de la Raza company nor Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Instituto Familiar de la Raza company nor Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Instituto Familiar de la Raza company employs more people globally than Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pathways Behavioral Services Inc. nor Instituto Familiar de la Raza holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N