Comparison Overview

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT

VS

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT

None
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

PATH at Stone Summit is a therapeutic community residence located in Danby, Vermont, adjacent to the beautiful Green Mountain National Forest. Set on 39 acres with panoramic views, PATH at Stone Summit provides an ideal setting for young adults ages 18-30 to learn the skills necessary to succeed in the challenges of life. PATH (Program for Adult Transition to Health) provides a bridge to health after either an intensive residential treatment or outpatient process.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof

Stationsstraat 27a, Veghel, 5461 JS, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof Veghel draagt door behandeling en haar diensten en producten op het gebied van geestelijke gezondheid en welzijn bij aan een optimale kwaliteit van leven van haar cliënten. De dienstverlening is erop gericht de cliënt de regie over zijn/ haar eigen leven te laten houden of verbeteren. Als groepspraktijk dragen wij professionele zorg met elkaar. We bundelen onze expertise waardoor we cliënten meer behandelingsmogelijkheden kunnen bieden en delen onze kennis en ervaring in intervisies en multidisciplinair overleg. We werken vanuit een bio-psycho-sociaal model (holistisch): we integreren onze expertise met gezins- en familiesystemen, alsook met organisatie- en bedrijfssystemen. Samen Doen is in deze ook uitgaan van een holistische visie dat lichaam en geest echt één zijn. Ons logo is de Feniks. Wij behandelen om je te laten opstaan uit de as. Begeleiden je op je pad en lopen naast je. Wij coachen je om te leren vliegen.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/path-at-stone-summit.jpeg
PATH AT STONE SUMMIT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologisch-centrum-lambertushof-veghel.jpeg
Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PATH AT STONE SUMMIT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PATH AT STONE SUMMIT in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof in 2026.

Incident History — PATH AT STONE SUMMIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/path-at-stone-summit.jpeg
PATH AT STONE SUMMIT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologisch-centrum-lambertushof-veghel.jpeg
Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company.

In the current year, Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company and PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company nor PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company nor PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company nor PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof company employs more people globally than PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Psychologisch Centrum Lambertushof holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H