Comparison Overview

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT

VS

Austin Clubhouse

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT

None
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

PATH at Stone Summit is a therapeutic community residence located in Danby, Vermont, adjacent to the beautiful Green Mountain National Forest. Set on 39 acres with panoramic views, PATH at Stone Summit provides an ideal setting for young adults ages 18-30 to learn the skills necessary to succeed in the challenges of life. PATH (Program for Adult Transition to Health) provides a bridge to health after either an intensive residential treatment or outpatient process.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Austin Clubhouse

610 E 45th Street, Austin, Texas, 78751, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Our mission: Austin Clubhouse exists to provide acceptance and empowerment so adults living with mental health diagnoses can pursue personal goals and play a meaningful role as co-workers, colleagues, family members and friends. Our vision is of a recovery-oriented Central Texas community in which all people living with a mental health diagnosis will achieve their highest potential. Austin Clubhouse is a place where adults living with mental illness can come together and work towards wellness. Our high impact, recovery-oriented services help members manage their illness and rejoin the worlds of employment and education, and reconnect with family, friends, and community. We provide an accepting place to spend the day, valuable work to perform within the organization, opportunities to develop meaningful relationships, and access to employment, education, and other resources in the Austin area. All Clubhouses are monitored and credentialed by Clubhouse International (formally ICCD). Clubhouse International's mission is to build and coordinate a strong international network of clubhouse model programs, founded on the realization that recovery from serious mental illness must involve the whole person in a vital community offering respect, hope, mutuality, and unlimited opportunity to access the worlds of education, housing, work, and friendship.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/path-at-stone-summit.jpeg
PATH AT STONE SUMMIT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/austin-clubhouse.jpeg
Austin Clubhouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PATH AT STONE SUMMIT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Austin Clubhouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PATH AT STONE SUMMIT in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Austin Clubhouse in 2026.

Incident History — PATH AT STONE SUMMIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Austin Clubhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Austin Clubhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/path-at-stone-summit.jpeg
PATH AT STONE SUMMIT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/austin-clubhouse.jpeg
Austin Clubhouse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Austin Clubhouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Austin Clubhouse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company.

In the current year, Austin Clubhouse company and PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Austin Clubhouse company nor PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Austin Clubhouse company nor PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Austin Clubhouse company nor PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company nor Austin Clubhouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company nor Austin Clubhouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Austin Clubhouse company employs more people globally than PATH AT STONE SUMMIT company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PATH AT STONE SUMMIT nor Austin Clubhouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N