Comparison Overview

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

VS

Underground Productions

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

71 East Main Street, Patchogue, NY, 11772, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.patchoguetheatre.org

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts (PTPA) is a nonprofit arts organization dedicated to enriching, educating, and entertaining a diverse audience through a wide range of performing artists. The theatre serves as a cultural hub for the community and the Long Island region, collaborating with local organizations and promoting educational initiatives. Originally opened in 1923 as the largest theatre in Suffolk County, Patchogue Theatre hosts 1,100 seats. Following its rescue by the Village of Patchogue in 1996 and subsequent restoration, the facility saw significant use, hosting events. PTPA operates independently as a not-for-profit organization, leasing the building from the Village of Patchogue and covering all operational costs without financial support from the Village. The theatre is overseen by a volunteer board of directors and professional staff, and its success is made possible through the dedication of numerous volunteers, businesses, funding sources, and individuals who contribute their time and resources to support the organization.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Underground Productions

Union Rd, Brisbane, Queensland, 4067, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.undergroundproductions.org.au

Underground Productions is the resident theatre and production company of UQ. We bring to the Schonell stage each year a great range of shows - short, long, original, professional, realist, absurd, comic, dramatic and musical - along with some occasional off-campus dalliances including perhaps an arts festival, a toured show or two, some festival appearances, and collaborations with other theatre companies. Underground provides a great opportunity for theatre-interested students to test the waters or hone their skills - catering for keen beginners through to seasoned theatre-makers. Throughout the year we offer positions... on the stage acting, singing or dancing backstage in lighting, sound and stage management designing sets, costumes, hair and makeup organising people, money, publicity, festivals, ticketing, events, or even the whole company ...as well as many more that we can't remember now. Facebook us, and we'll talk later.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-theatre-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/underground-productions.jpeg
Underground Productions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Underground Productions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Underground Productions in 2025.

Incident History — Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Underground Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Underground Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-theatre-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/underground-productions.jpeg
Underground Productions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Underground Productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Underground Productions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company.

In the current year, Underground Productions company and Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Underground Productions company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Underground Productions company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Underground Productions company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company nor Underground Productions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company nor Underground Productions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Underground Productions company employs more people globally than Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Underground Productions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References