Comparison Overview

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

VS

Berliner Ensemble

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

71 East Main Street, Patchogue, NY, 11772, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts (PTPA) is a nonprofit arts organization dedicated to enriching, educating, and entertaining a diverse audience through a wide range of performing artists. The theatre serves as a cultural hub for the community and the Long Island region, collaborating with local organizations and promoting educational initiatives. Originally opened in 1923 as the largest theatre in Suffolk County, Patchogue Theatre hosts 1,100 seats. Following its rescue by the Village of Patchogue in 1996 and subsequent restoration, the facility saw significant use, hosting events. PTPA operates independently as a not-for-profit organization, leasing the building from the Village of Patchogue and covering all operational costs without financial support from the Village. The theatre is overseen by a volunteer board of directors and professional staff, and its success is made possible through the dedication of numerous volunteers, businesses, funding sources, and individuals who contribute their time and resources to support the organization.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Berliner Ensemble

1 Bertolt-Brecht-Platz, Berlin, 10117, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Das Berliner Ensemble zählt zu den renommiertesten und traditionsreichsten Bühnen Deutschlands. Das Theater am Schiffbauerdamm, seit 1954 benannt nach Bertolt Brechts weltberühmter Kompanie, hat als Berliner Ensemble Theatergeschichte geschrieben. In seiner über 130-jährigen Geschichte hat das Haus am Schiffbauerdamm sich stets mit aktuellen gesellschaftsrelevanten Fragen auseinandergesetzt und legt seit der Intendanz von Oliver Reese den Fokus wieder verstärkt auf zeitgenössische Texte und aktuelle Themen.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-theatre-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/berliner-ensemble.jpeg
Berliner Ensemble
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Berliner Ensemble
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berliner Ensemble in 2025.

Incident History — Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Berliner Ensemble (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berliner Ensemble cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-theatre-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/berliner-ensemble.jpeg
Berliner Ensemble
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Blackmail
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Berliner Ensemble company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Berliner Ensemble company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has not reported any.

In the current year, Berliner Ensemble company and Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Berliner Ensemble company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Berliner Ensemble company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Berliner Ensemble company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company nor Berliner Ensemble company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company nor Berliner Ensemble company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Berliner Ensemble company employs more people globally than Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Berliner Ensemble holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N